Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally

Victorian Square Eviction Risk: Lower , Sparks

Tract 32031002902 · Washoe, NV · pop 4,512 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Tract 32031002902 covers Victorian Square in Sparks in Nevada. Home to 4,512 residents, it scores 4.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 14% of US census tracts.

26% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,380 a month while the average household earns $83,107 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 27% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 20% Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units1,549
Renter share26.6%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate10.6%
Median income$83,107

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#8 of 8 tracts In Victorian Square
Very Low
Within parent city
56 th percentile
Rank, 56th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 26 tracts In Sparks
Elevated
Within county
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#89 of 139 tracts In Washoe
Low
Within state
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#604 of 779 tracts In Nevada
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Sparks and the region

Centroid at 39.5518, -119.7433 · click any tract to drill in

Why Victorian Square scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Sparks
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.2
State political climate
Nevada legislature & governorship
3.7
Economic stress
10.6% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$1,380 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Sparks
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Sparks
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Sparks
3.0

How Victorian Square compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Victorian Square risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 002902Sparks: 4.14.1Sparksparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.24.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 62

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 41Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 13.80%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.8%Peak (2001)
  • 41Filings in 2001 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Victorian Square. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Victorian Square

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 3.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Sparks eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Washoe County average of 4.9 and below the Nevada statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 18.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 9.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and White and ranks around the 62nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 32031002902

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 32031002902?

Census tract 32031002902 in the Victorian Square neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 32031002902?

Median gross rent is $1,380/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 32031002902?

10.6% of residents in tract 32031002902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,512.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 32031002902?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 66th, household 40th, minority 76th, housing 52th.
Q5

Is tract 32031002902 considered part of Victorian Square?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 32031002902 fall within Victorian Square (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 32031002902?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 41 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 32031002902 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 13.80% of renter households, peaking at 13.8% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 32031002902 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 32031002902 compare to Sparks overall?

Tract 32031002902 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Sparks at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Sparks eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Sparks

Top eight tracts in Sparks ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related