Garfield Park Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 34003057101 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 4,187 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 34003057101 (Garfield Park in Garfield, New Jersey) comes in at 6.3/10, the Elevated tier. On the national scale it ranks #14,661 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 40% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,420 monthly, set against $77,464 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 80% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Garfield and the region
Centroid at 40.8568, -74.0990 · click any tract to drill in
Why Garfield Park scores 6.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Garfield Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 68
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 68%Socioeconomic
- 50%Household composition
- 59%Racial/ethnic minority
- 66%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 55%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 321Total filings over 5 yrs
- 4.44%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.0%Peak (2014)
- 45Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Garfield Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.9%Housing insecurity
- 6.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.9%Food insecurity
- 7.5%SNAP enrollment
- 6.9%Transit barriers
- 10.3%No health insurance
- 16.0%Frequent mental distress
- 23.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Garfield Park
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Garfield eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Bergen County average of 6.3 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 68th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 321 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 4.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 6.0% of renter households in 2014.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 34003057101
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003057101?
What is the average rent in tract 34003057101?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34003057101?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34003057101?
Is tract 34003057101 considered part of Garfield Park?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34003057101?
What share of households in tract 34003057101 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34003057101 compare to Garfield overall?
Was tract 34003057101 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Garfield
Top eight tracts in Garfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.