Garfield Park Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 34003021400 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 5,117 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Census tract 34003021400 runs through Garfield Park in Garfield. With 5,117 residents, it scores 7.1/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 96% of US census tracts.
54% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 28% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,597 a month while the average household earns $64,119 a year, roughly 30% of income at the averages. About 54% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Garfield and the region
Centroid at 40.8799, -74.0991 · click any tract to drill in
Why Garfield Park scores 7.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Garfield Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 68
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 84%Socioeconomic
- 24%Household composition
- 63%Racial/ethnic minority
- 57%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 1%Grade C
- 89%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 317Total filings over 5 yrs
- 6.27%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.9%Peak (2013)
- 46Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Garfield Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 17.6%Housing insecurity
- 10.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 20.4%Food insecurity
- 13.4%SNAP enrollment
- 10.1%Transit barriers
- 16.8%No health insurance
- 18.0%Frequent mental distress
- 29.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Garfield Park
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 9.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Garfield eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Bergen County average of 6.3 and above the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 317 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 6.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.9% of renter households in 2013.
This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 89% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
About tract 34003021400
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003021400?
What is the average rent in tract 34003021400?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34003021400?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34003021400?
Is tract 34003021400 considered part of Garfield Park?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34003021400?
What share of households in tract 34003021400 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34003021400 compare to Garfield overall?
Was tract 34003021400 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Garfield
Top eight tracts in Garfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.