Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally
Golden Triangle Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 34007603301 · Camden County, NJ · pop 5,861 · 43% of tract blocks fall in Golden Triangle
Tract 34007603301 sits in Golden Triangle, NJ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.9/10. It is home to 5,861 residents. 19% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Camden County average of 48.5%.
Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%
Stable renters 29%
Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units2,220
Renter share36.0%
SVI overall0.59
Poverty rate4.6%
Median income$107,800
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
38
th percentile
Low
Within state
34
th percentile
Low
National
59
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Golden Triangle and the region
Centroid at 39.9270, -75.0212 · click any tract to drill in
Why Golden Triangle scores 4.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Golden Triangle
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.6% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,892 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Golden Triangle
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Golden Triangle
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Golden Triangle
5.0
How Golden Triangle compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 59
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 46%Socioeconomic
- 63%Household composition
- 54%Racial/ethnic minority
- 66%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 918Total filings over 6 yrs
- 15.41%Avg annual filing rate
- 16.9%Peak (2015)
- 156Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 16% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.8%Housing insecurity
- 5.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.9%Food insecurity
- 5.7%SNAP enrollment
- 5.9%Transit barriers
- 8.5%No health insurance
- 14.4%Frequent mental distress
- 23.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Golden Triangle
The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.4/10. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.2/10. Average gross rent is $1,892, 25% below the Golden Triangle average.
On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.9/10. SNAP participation runs 5.7% against 15.2% nationally. Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 918 filings here across 6 tracked years.
It sits 0.8 points below the Camden County average of 5.7. The worst year on record was 2015, when 16.9% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 15.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 59% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.3/10.
Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007603301
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007603301?
Census tract 34007603301 in Golden Triangle scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007603301?
Median gross rent is $1,892/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 19% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007603301?
4.6% of residents in tract 34007603301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,861.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007603301?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 59th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 46th, household 63th, minority 54th, housing 66th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007603301?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 918 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007603301 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.41% of renter households, peaking at 16.9% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
What share of households in tract 34007603301 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 34007603301 compare to Golden Triangle overall?
Tract 34007603301 scores 4.9/10, lower than the parent city of Golden Triangle at 6.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Golden Triangle; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 34007603301 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Golden Triangle
Top eight tracts in Golden Triangle ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related