Within neighborhood
60
th percentile
Elevated
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,618 of 84,120 nationally
Fairview Eviction Risk: Moderate , Gloucester City
Tract 34007604600 · Camden County, NJ · pop 2,050 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi
Census tract 34007604600 covers part of the Fairview area of Oaklyn, NJ, and scores 5.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,050. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9.4/10.
Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20%
Stable renters 30%
Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units1,035
Renter share50.1%
SVI overall0.37
Poverty rate6.9%
Median income$71,838
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
60
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
54
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Gloucester City and the region
Centroid at 39.9051, -75.0777 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fairview scores 5.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Gloucester City
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.9% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,138 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Gloucester City
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Gloucester City
7.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Gloucester City
4.7
How Fairview compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 37
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 37%Socioeconomic
- 35%Household composition
- 43%Racial/ethnic minority
- 42%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 74%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 178Total filings over 6 yrs
- 6.61%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.4%Peak (2013)
- 35Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Fairview. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.5%Housing insecurity
- 6.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.3%Food insecurity
- 7.1%SNAP enrollment
- 6.3%Transit barriers
- 8.0%No health insurance
- 15.9%Frequent mental distress
- 23.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fairview
Running cool, supply constraint reads 1.3/10. The severe-burden share is 20%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.7/10.
Cost burden runs 40% here against 48.5% across Camden County. Court records carry 178 eviction filings across 6 observed years. SNAP participation runs 7.1% against 15.2% nationally.
The worst year on record was 2013, when 7.4% of renter households were served. Average gross rent is $1,138, 9% below the Oaklyn average.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Camden. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 6.6% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 77% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 34007604600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34007604600?
Census tract 34007604600 in the Fairview neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34007604600?
Median gross rent is $1,138/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34007604600?
6.9% of residents in tract 34007604600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,050.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34007604600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 37th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 37th, household 35th, minority 43th, housing 42th.
Q5
Is tract 34007604600 considered part of Fairview?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34007604600 fall within Fairview (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34007604600?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 178 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34007604600 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.61% of renter households, peaking at 7.4% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34007604600 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34007604600 compare to Gloucester City overall?
Tract 34007604600 scores 5.9/10, higher than the parent city of Gloucester City at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Gloucester City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 34007604600 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Gloucester City
Top eight tracts in Gloucester City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related