Census Tract · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally
Tract 34039033400 Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 34039033400 ·
Union County, NJ · pop 3,751
Tract 34039033400, home to 3,751 residents in Union, scores 6.5/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 87% of US census tracts.
100% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $141,184 a year. Renters make up 1% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%Stable renters 0%Owners 99%
Tract context
Occupied units1,306
Renter share1.0%
SVI overall0.12
Poverty rate3.1%
Median income$141,184
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
19th percentile
#98 of 120 tracts In Union County
Very Low
Within state
32th percentile
#1,483 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Low
National
25th percentile
#63,481 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Union County and the region
Centroid at 40.6821, -74.2560 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 34039033400 scores 2.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
State baseline
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0
How Tract 34039033400 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 12
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
12%Socioeconomic
59%Household composition
67%Racial/ethnic minority
3%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
84%Grade A
10%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
10.5%Housing insecurity
5.5%Utility-shutoff threat
11.0%Food insecurity
5.5%SNAP enrollment
5.9%Transit barriers
10.5%No health insurance
13.5%Frequent mental distress
21.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Tract 34039033400
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are set by New Jersey eviction laws law, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Union County average of 6.6 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 12th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of A ("Best"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 34039033400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34039033400?
Census tract 34039033400 in Union County scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 34039033400?
3.1% of residents in tract 34039033400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,751.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 34039033400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 12th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 59th, minority 67th, housing 3th.
Q4
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34039033400?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 18 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 34039033400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.40% of renter households, peaking at 6.3% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q5
What share of households in tract 34039033400 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
Was tract 34039033400 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.