Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #5,413 of 84,120 nationally

Niagara Falls Eviction Risk: High

Tract 36063020200 · Niagara County, NY · pop 2,595

36063020200 is a census tract in Niagara Falls, NY. It scores 8.5/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,595. Severe burden reaches 50%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
8.5
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 56% Stable renters 22% Owners 22%
Tract context
Occupied units1,164
Renter share78.6%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate52.2%
Median income$22,886

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#8 of 20 tracts In Niagara Falls
Elevated
Within county
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#12 of 65 tracts In Niagara County
High
Within state
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#2,229 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Elevated
National
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#5,413 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Niagara Falls and the region

Centroid at 43.1181, -79.0431 · click any tract to drill in

Why Niagara Falls scores 8.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Niagara Falls
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
52.2% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$789 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Niagara Falls
8.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Niagara Falls
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Niagara Falls
8.4

How Niagara Falls compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Niagara Falls risk score vs. parent city / county / state8.5This tracttract 0202007.1Niagara Fallsparent city6.4Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Niagara Falls

72% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far above the Niagara County average of 40.9%. The dominant input is economic stress at 10/10. Food insecurity runs 53.3% against 17.8% nationally.

The poverty rate is 52%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 32.8% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

Set annual rent against average income of $22,886 and the ratio lands at 41%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. It sits 2.1 points above the Niagara County average of 6.4.

79% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.5/10. Running hot, housing-court posture reads 8.4/10.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #5,413 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 9.5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 36063020200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36063020200?

Census tract 36063020200 in Niagara Falls scores 8.5/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36063020200?

Median gross rent is $789/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 72% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36063020200?

52.2% of residents in tract 36063020200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,595.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36063020200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 84th, household 98th, minority 91th, housing 78th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 36063020200 struggle to pay rent?

About 40.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 32.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 36063020200 compare to Niagara Falls overall?

Tract 36063020200 scores 8.5/10, higher than the parent city of Niagara Falls at 7.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Niagara Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 36063020200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 30% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Niagara Falls

Top eight tracts in Niagara Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related