Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally

Mount Washington Eviction Risk: Lower , Cincinnati

Tract 39061004605 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 2,457 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

With a score of 5.4/10, tract 39061004605 in Mount Washington in Cincinnati ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 2,457 residents. On the national scale it ranks #40,092 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 45% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,081 a month against an average household income of $77,342 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 47% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 26% Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,336
Renter share47.3%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate3.7%
Median income$77,342

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Mount Washington
Very Low
Within parent city
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#99 of 110 tracts In Cincinnati
Very Low
Within county
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#137 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Low
Within state
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#1,651 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cincinnati and the region

Centroid at 39.0968, -84.4036 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mount Washington scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cincinnati
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
3.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,081 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cincinnati
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cincinnati
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cincinnati
4.5

How Mount Washington compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mount Washington risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.43.4This tracttract 004605Cincinnati: 3.43.4Cincinnatiparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 714Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 6.45%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.5%Peak (2009)
  • 33Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610046052002: 31 filings (4.27/100 renter HHs)2003: 56 filings (7.71/100 renter HHs)2004: 49 filings (6.74/100 renter HHs)2005: 47 filings (7.28/100 renter HHs)2006: 50 filings (7.74/100 renter HHs)2007: 49 filings (7.59/100 renter HHs)2008: 55 filings (8.52/100 renter HHs)2009: 81 filings (12.54/100 renter HHs)2010: 56 filings (8.62/100 renter HHs)2011: 53 filings (6.64/100 renter HHs)2012: 23 filings (2.88/100 renter HHs)2013: 32 filings (4.01/100 renter HHs)2014: 27 filings (3.38/100 renter HHs)2015: 49 filings (6.14/100 renter HHs)2016: 23 filings (3.75/100 renter HHs)2018: 33 filings (5.37/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 86Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.47×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-06-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (1.88× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (0.59× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (0.88× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2026-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mount Washington. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mount Washington

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 10th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.47x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061004605

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061004605?

Census tract 39061004605 in the Mount Washington neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061004605?

Median gross rent is $1,081/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061004605?

3.7% of residents in tract 39061004605 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,457.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061004605?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 4th, minority 38th, housing 25th.
Q5

Is tract 39061004605 considered part of Mount Washington?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061004605 fall within Mount Washington (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061004605?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 714 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061004605 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.45% of renter households, peaking at 12.5% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061004605 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.47× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061004605 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061004605 compare to Cincinnati overall?

Tract 39061004605 scores 3.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Cincinnati at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cincinnati

Top eight tracts in Cincinnati ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related