Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,316 of 84,120 nationally

Saint Peters Lick Run Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Cincinnati

Tract 39061008601 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 2,165 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Tract 39061008601 covers the Saint Peters Lick Run Historic District neighborhood of Cincinnati in Ohio. Home to 2,165 residents, it scores 5.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 64% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 38% of renter households, a high level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $488 monthly, set against $30,482 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 59% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 36% Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units1,025
Renter share59.1%
SVI overall0.88
Poverty rate27.2%
Median income$30,482

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#5 of 8 tracts In Saint Peters Lick Run Historic District
Moderate
Within parent city
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#32 of 110 tracts In Cincinnati
Elevated
Within county
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#37 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
High
Within state
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#228 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cincinnati and the region

Centroid at 39.1356, -84.5570 · click any tract to drill in

Why Saint Peters Lick Run Historic District scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cincinnati
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
27.2% poverty · this tract
6.8
Supply constraint
$488 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cincinnati
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cincinnati
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cincinnati
4.5

How Saint Peters Lick Run Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Saint Peters Lick Run Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.85.8This tracttract 008601Cincinnati: 3.43.4Cincinnatiparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 88

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,260Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 18.91%Avg annual filing rate
  • 24.0%Peak (2002)
  • 97Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610086012002: 304 filings (24.03/100 renter HHs)2003: 259 filings (20.47/100 renter HHs)2004: 159 filings (12.57/100 renter HHs)2005: 166 filings (28.67/100 renter HHs)2006: 156 filings (26.94/100 renter HHs)2007: 191 filings (32.99/100 renter HHs)2008: 155 filings (26.77/100 renter HHs)2009: 130 filings (22.45/100 renter HHs)2010: 103 filings (19.58/100 renter HHs)2011: 107 filings (13.84/100 renter HHs)2012: 125 filings (16.17/100 renter HHs)2013: 84 filings (10.87/100 renter HHs)2014: 84 filings (10.87/100 renter HHs)2015: 62 filings (8.02/100 renter HHs)2016: 78 filings (12.64/100 renter HHs)2018: 97 filings (15.72/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 68% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 358Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 6.5Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.72×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.26× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-10-01: 4 filings (0.59× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (0.74× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.93× baseline)2021-02-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2021-03-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2021-04-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2021-06-01: 5 filings (0.64× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (0.31× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (0.47× baseline)2021-09-01: 8 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-11-01: 7 filings (1.30× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-01-01: 11 filings (2.04× baseline)2022-02-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (0.81× baseline)2022-06-01: 8 filings (1.03× baseline)2022-07-01: 5 filings (0.52× baseline)2022-08-01: 11 filings (1.28× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (0.54× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.29× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (1.11× baseline)2022-12-01: 8 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-01-01: 23 filings (4.26× baseline)2023-02-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-05-01: 7 filings (1.13× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (0.64× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (0.31× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (0.12× baseline)2023-09-01: 38 filings (3.39× baseline)2023-10-01: 9 filings (1.32× baseline)2023-11-01: 2 filings (0.37× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-01-01: 4 filings (0.74× baseline)2024-02-01: 8 filings (1.54× baseline)2024-03-01: 10 filings (1.61× baseline)2024-04-01: 11 filings (1.83× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (0.52× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.23× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (0.54× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (0.74× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (0.74× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (1.04× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (0.65× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-08-01: 4 filings (0.47× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-10-01: 6 filings (0.88× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.37× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2026-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Saint Peters Lick Run Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Saint Peters Lick Run Historic District

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 6.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 88th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.72x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061008601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061008601?

Census tract 39061008601 in the Saint Peters Lick Run Historic District neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061008601?

Median gross rent is $488/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061008601?

27.2% of residents in tract 39061008601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,165.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061008601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 88th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 79th, minority 87th, housing 54th.
Q5

Is tract 39061008601 considered part of Saint Peters Lick Run Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061008601 fall within Saint Peters Lick Run Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061008601?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,260 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061008601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 18.91% of renter households, peaking at 24.0% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061008601 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.72× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061008601 struggle to pay rent?

About 33.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 29.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061008601 compare to Cincinnati overall?

Tract 39061008601 scores 5.8/10, higher than the parent city of Cincinnati at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cincinnati

Top eight tracts in Cincinnati ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related