Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #76,223 of 84,120 nationally

Village Historic District Eviction Risk: Lower , Cincinnati

Tract 39061022602 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 2,775 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Village Historic District in Cincinnati anchors census tract 39061022602, which lands at 4.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 20% of US census tracts.

About 28% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,241 a month while the average household earns $102,545 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 17% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 13% Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units1,087
Renter share17.3%
SVI overall0.12
Poverty rate1.8%
Median income$102,545

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Village Historic District
Low
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Cincinnati
Very High
Within county
12 th percentile
Rank, 12th percentileLowHigh
#198 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#2,828 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cincinnati and the region

Centroid at 39.2290, -84.4687 · click any tract to drill in

Why Village Historic District scores 1.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cincinnati
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
1.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,241 rent vs county FMR
4.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cincinnati
1.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cincinnati
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cincinnati
1.9

How Village Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Village Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.81.8This tracttract 022602Cincinnati: 3.43.4Cincinnatiparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 12

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 271Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 5.43%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.6%Peak (2012)
  • 20Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610226022002: 7 filings (2.34/100 renter HHs)2003: 4 filings (1.34/100 renter HHs)2004: 9 filings (3.01/100 renter HHs)2005: 4 filings (1.30/100 renter HHs)2006: 9 filings (2.93/100 renter HHs)2007: 19 filings (6.18/100 renter HHs)2008: 19 filings (6.18/100 renter HHs)2009: 18 filings (5.85/100 renter HHs)2010: 18 filings (6.19/100 renter HHs)2011: 34 filings (9.74/100 renter HHs)2012: 37 filings (10.60/100 renter HHs)2013: 25 filings (7.16/100 renter HHs)2014: 17 filings (4.87/100 renter HHs)2015: 12 filings (3.44/100 renter HHs)2016: 19 filings (7.66/100 renter HHs)2018: 20 filings (8.06/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 186% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 103Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.73×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 3 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (1.43× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (1.15× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-04-01: 7 filings (4.38× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (2.22× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 5 filings (2.78× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (1.07× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.59× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (1.88× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (1.11× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (1.11× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2026-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Village Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Village Historic District

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 4.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 12th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061022602

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061022602?

Census tract 39061022602 in the Village Historic District neighborhood scores 1.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061022602?

Median gross rent is $1,241/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061022602?

1.8% of residents in tract 39061022602 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,775.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061022602?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 12th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 59th, minority 53th, housing 9th.
Q5

Is tract 39061022602 considered part of Village Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061022602 fall within Village Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061022602?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 271 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061022602 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.43% of renter households, peaking at 10.6% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061022602 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.73× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061022602 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061022602 compare to Cincinnati overall?

Tract 39061022602 scores 1.8/10, lower than the parent city of Cincinnati at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cincinnati

Top eight tracts in Cincinnati ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related