Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally
Fruitland Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Painesville
Tract 39085206200 · Lake County, OH · pop 1,571 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 39085206200 sits in Fruitland Park in Painesville, Ohio eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 4.3/10. That is riskier than about 18% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 26% of renter households, a moderate level, and 9% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $955 monthly, set against $70,625 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 22% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 16%
Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units745
Renter share22.0%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate9.1%
Median income$70,625
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
66
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
31
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Painesville and the region
Centroid at 41.7338, -81.2797 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fruitland Park scores 2.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Painesville
4.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
9.1% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$955 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Painesville
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Painesville
3.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Painesville
4.3
How Fruitland Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 15
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 20%Socioeconomic
- 24%Household composition
- 14%Racial/ethnic minority
- 24%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 135Total filings over 14 yrs
- 4.85%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.6%Peak (2009)
- 8Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 60% over the past 14 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Fruitland Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.4%Housing insecurity
- 6.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.1%Food insecurity
- 8.5%SNAP enrollment
- 6.3%Transit barriers
- 7.4%No health insurance
- 17.1%Frequent mental distress
- 28.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fruitland Park
The heaviest input here is housing court bias at 4.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Painesville, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Lake County average of 4.8 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 135 eviction filings here over 14 tracked years, with about 4.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 11.6% of renter households in 2009.
In CDC survey modeling, about 9.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 39085206200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39085206200?
Census tract 39085206200 in the Fruitland Park neighborhood scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39085206200?
Median gross rent is $955/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39085206200?
9.1% of residents in tract 39085206200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,571.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39085206200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 24th, minority 14th, housing 24th.
Q5
Is tract 39085206200 considered part of Fruitland Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39085206200 fall within Fruitland Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39085206200?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 135 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 39085206200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.85% of renter households, peaking at 11.6% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39085206200 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39085206200 compare to Painesville overall?
Tract 39085206200 scores 2.7/10, right in line with the parent city of Painesville at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Painesville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related