Neighborhood · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally

Lansdowne Eviction Risk: Lower , Youngstown

Tract 39099800502 · Mahoning County, OH · pop 859 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Tract 39099800502, home to 859 residents in the Lansdowne area of Youngstown, scores 5.6/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 60% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Risk score

2.8

Lower

Confidence 45% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 0% Owners 100%

Tract context

SVI overall-10.00

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Youngstown and the region

Centroid at 41.1261, -80.6316 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lansdowne scores 2.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Youngstown

5.4

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

4.9

State political climate

Ohio legislature & governorship

2.4

Economic stress

this tract poverty rate

3.0

Supply constraint

tract rent vs county FMR

5.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Youngstown

7.8

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

2.7

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Youngstown

8.6

Housing court bias

Inherited from Youngstown

8.6

How Lansdowne compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: -1,000

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

-1,000%Socioeconomic
-1,000%Household composition
77%Racial/ethnic minority
-1,000%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
9%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lansdowne. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

39.5%Housing insecurity
34.4%Utility-shutoff threat
51.9%Food insecurity
54.9%SNAP enrollment
28.6%Transit barriers
24.5%No health insurance
26.0%Frequent mental distress
42.7%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lansdowne

What moves this score most is housing court bias at 8.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Youngstown eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Mahoning County average of 5.8 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 1000th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 9% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39099800502

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39099800502?

Census tract 39099800502 in the Lansdowne neighborhood scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

How socially vulnerable is tract 39099800502?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the -1000th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic -1000th, household -1000th, minority 77th, housing -1000th.

Is tract 39099800502 considered part of Lansdowne?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39099800502 fall within Lansdowne (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 39099800502 struggle to pay rent?

About 39.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 34.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 39099800502 compare to Youngstown overall?

Tract 39099800502 scores 2.8/10, lower than the parent city of Youngstown at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Youngstown eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 39099800502 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 9% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Youngstown

Top eight tracts in Youngstown ranked by composite eviction-risk score.