Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally
West Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Cuyahoga Falls
Tract 39153520302 ·
Summit County, OH · pop 3,793 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
Eviction risk in the West Village neighborhood of Cuyahoga Falls centers on tract 39153520302, which scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 3,793 residents. It lands near the 20th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.
About 16% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,102 a month against an average household income of $96,884 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 19% of occupied homes.
Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 16%Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,566
Renter share19.2%
SVI overall0.08
Poverty rate3.4%
Median income$96,884
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In West Village
Very Low
Within parent city
0th percentile
#13 of 13 tracts In Cuyahoga Falls
Very Low
Within county
14th percentile
#119 of 138 tracts In Summit County
Very Low
Within state
13th percentile
#2,766 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cuyahoga Falls and the region
Centroid at 41.1399, -81.5014 · click any tract to drill in
Why West Village scores 1.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
3.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,102 rent vs county FMR
4.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.7
How West Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 8
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
20%Socioeconomic
10%Household composition
33%Racial/ethnic minority
11%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
23%Grade A
76%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
138Total filings over 17 yrs
2.47%Avg annual filing rate
4.7%Peak (2017)
12Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year2002 to 2018
Filings climbed 33% over the past 17 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within West Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
7.5%Housing insecurity
5.2%Utility-shutoff threat
7.8%Food insecurity
5.5%SNAP enrollment
4.9%Transit barriers
5.3%No health insurance
16.1%Frequent mental distress
24.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in West Village
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 7.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Summit County average of 5.2 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 39153520302
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39153520302?
Census tract 39153520302 in the West Village neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39153520302?
Median gross rent is $1,102/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 16% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39153520302?
3.4% of residents in tract 39153520302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,793.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39153520302?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 8th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 10th, minority 33th, housing 11th.
Q5
Is tract 39153520302 considered part of West Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39153520302 fall within West Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39153520302?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 138 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 39153520302 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.47% of renter households, peaking at 4.7% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39153520302 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39153520302 compare to Cuyahoga Falls overall?
Tract 39153520302 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Cuyahoga Falls at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 39153520302 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cuyahoga Falls
Top eight tracts in Cuyahoga Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.