Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,095 of 84,120 nationally
West Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Cuyahoga Falls
Tract 39153520202 · Summit County, OH · pop 4,614 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
Tract 39153520202 sits in the West Village area of Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk, OH, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.3/10. Population here is 4,614. 53% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly above the Summit County average of 41.2%.
Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23%
Stable renters 20%
Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units2,174
Renter share42.7%
SVI overall0.57
Poverty rate15.9%
Median income$44,474
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
71
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
75
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cuyahoga Falls and the region
Centroid at 41.1299, -81.4919 · click any tract to drill in
Why West Village scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
15.9% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$787 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.7
How West Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 57
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 62%Socioeconomic
- 74%Household composition
- 25%Racial/ethnic minority
- 41%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 33%Grade A
- 41%Grade B
- 20%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 417Total filings over 17 yrs
- 2.39%Avg annual filing rate
- 3.9%Peak (2006)
- 26Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 17 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within West Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.5%Housing insecurity
- 9.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 15.9%Food insecurity
- 14.0%SNAP enrollment
- 8.6%Transit barriers
- 8.3%No health insurance
- 19.6%Frequent mental distress
- 32.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in West Village
The main counterweight is supply constraint at 2/10. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.1/10.
At $787 a month, rents run 24% under what the rest of Cuyahoga Falls commands. Against the Summit County average of 4.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.2 points. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.4/10.
11% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Court records carry 417 eviction filings across 17 observed years.
The worst year on record was 2006, when 3.9% of renter households were served. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Akron. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 2.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 67% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 39153520202
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39153520202?
Census tract 39153520202 in the West Village neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39153520202?
Median gross rent is $787/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39153520202?
15.9% of residents in tract 39153520202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,614.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39153520202?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 57th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 74th, minority 25th, housing 41th.
Q5
Is tract 39153520202 considered part of West Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39153520202 fall within West Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39153520202?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 417 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 39153520202 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.39% of renter households, peaking at 3.9% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39153520202 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39153520202 compare to Cuyahoga Falls overall?
Tract 39153520202 scores 5.3/10, higher than the parent city of Cuyahoga Falls at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 39153520202 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cuyahoga Falls
Top eight tracts in Cuyahoga Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OH
Underwood
5.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
East Village
4.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Weatherstone
4.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
North Village
4.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
North Village
4.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Berkshire Park Historic District
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
Hampton Bluff
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
Cross Creek
3.5
/ 10 · Low
Related