Bren-Rose Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

At $2,288 a month, rents run 117% over what the rest of Tulsa commands. The voucher gap is 94.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. 25% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Tulsa County average of 40.3%.

On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.4/10. The severe-burden share is 13%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Housing insecurity runs 5.0% against 14.2% nationally. Against the Tulsa County average of 3.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.8% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Tulsa. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Only 7% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 2.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Against average income of $207,813, annual rent is just 13%. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.