Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #7,382 of 84,120 nationally
Albina Eviction Risk: High , Portland
Tract 41051002203 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 4,492 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
With a score of 8.1/10, tract 41051002203 in the Albina area of Portland, OR reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,492. What pushes it up most is local political climate at 9/10.
Risk score
8.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 35%
Stable renters 38%
Owners 27%
Tract context
Occupied units2,502
Renter share73.0%
SVI overall0.46
Poverty rate13.0%
Median income$78,171
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
68
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
74
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
93
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Portland and the region
Centroid at 45.5440, -122.6671 · click any tract to drill in
Why Albina scores 8.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
13.0% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,535 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5
How Albina compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 46
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 33%Socioeconomic
- 6%Household composition
- 44%Racial/ethnic minority
- 94%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 19%Grade C
- 67%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,052Total filings over 16 yrs
- 7.61%Avg annual filing rate
- 15.7%Peak (2003)
- 37Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 42% over the past 16 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 436Total filings 2020-21
- 5.7Avg monthly (observed)
- 4.0Pre-pandemic baseline
- 1.40×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Albina. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Albina
Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 9/10. This is renter territory: 73% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10.
The severe-burden share is 14%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The filing record is not thin: 1,052 evictions over 16 years of observation. It sits 0.7 points above the Multnomah County average of 7.4.
The worst year on record was 2003, when 15.7% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 7.6% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #7,382 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 41051002203
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051002203?
Census tract 41051002203 in the Albina neighborhood scores 8.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 41051002203?
Median gross rent is $1,535/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 41051002203?
13.0% of residents in tract 41051002203 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,492.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 41051002203?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 46th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 6th, minority 44th, housing 94th.
Q5
Is tract 41051002203 considered part of Albina?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051002203 fall within Albina (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051002203?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,052 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051002203 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 7.61% of renter households, peaking at 15.7% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 41051002203 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.40× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 41051002203 compare to Portland overall?
Tract 41051002203 scores 8.1/10, higher than the parent city of Portland at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 41051002203 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 67% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Portland
Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OR
Russellville
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Powellhurst
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Chinatown
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Powellhurst
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Portsmouth
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Jade District
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Powellhurst
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Arleta
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Related