Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,735 of 84,120 nationally

Burlingame Eviction Risk: Moderate , Portland

Tract 41051006200 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 3,133 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 41051006200 (the Burlingame neighborhood of Portland, Oregon) comes in at 6.3/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 82% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 23% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 4% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,094 a month against an average household income of $128,333 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. Renters make up 16% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 12% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,340
Renter share16.1%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate7.7%
Median income$128,333

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Burlingame
Very Low
Within parent city
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#137 of 168 tracts In Portland
Very Low
Within county
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#150 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
Low
Within state
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#551 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Portland and the region

Centroid at 45.4649, -122.6886 · click any tract to drill in

Why Burlingame scores 4.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
7.7% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$2,094 rent vs county FMR
5.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5

How Burlingame compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Burlingame risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.54.5This tracttract 006200Portland: 8.18.1Portlandparent cityCounty: 5.35.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 3

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 92Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 2.25%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.4%Peak (2002)
  • 2Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410510062002000: 4 filings (1.77/100 renter HHs)2001: 3 filings (1.33/100 renter HHs)2002: 10 filings (4.42/100 renter HHs)2003: 7 filings (3.10/100 renter HHs)2004: 8 filings (3.54/100 renter HHs)2005: 9 filings (3.61/100 renter HHs)2006: 4 filings (1.61/100 renter HHs)2007: 3 filings (1.20/100 renter HHs)2008: 5 filings (2.01/100 renter HHs)2009: 8 filings (3.21/100 renter HHs)2010: 6 filings (2.20/100 renter HHs)2012: 7 filings (2.22/100 renter HHs)2013: 8 filings (2.53/100 renter HHs)2014: 5 filings (1.58/100 renter HHs)2015: 3 filings (0.95/100 renter HHs)2016: 2 filings (0.76/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 21Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.84×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Burlingame. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Burlingame

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Portland eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and in line with the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.84x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41051006200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051006200?

Census tract 41051006200 in the Burlingame neighborhood scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41051006200?

Median gross rent is $2,094/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41051006200?

7.7% of residents in tract 41051006200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,133.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41051006200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 10th, household 4th, minority 26th, housing 10th.
Q5

Is tract 41051006200 considered part of Burlingame?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051006200 fall within Burlingame (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051006200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 92 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051006200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.25% of renter households, peaking at 4.4% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 41051006200 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.84× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 41051006200 compare to Portland overall?

Tract 41051006200 scores 4.5/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 41051006200 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Portland

Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related