Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #3,797 of 84,120 nationally
Jade District Eviction Risk: High , Portland
Tract 41051008301 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 4,114 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
41051008301 is a census tract in the Jade District area of Portland, OR. It scores 9.1/10 for landlords. Population here is 4,114. The severe-burden share is 33%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
9.1
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32%
Stable renters 28%
Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units1,673
Renter share59.5%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate26.0%
Median income$64,432
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
86
th percentile
High
Within county
88
th percentile
High
Within state
100
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Portland and the region
Centroid at 45.4974, -122.5722 · click any tract to drill in
Why Jade District scores 9.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
26.0% poverty · this tract
6.5
Supply constraint
$1,515 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5
How Jade District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 90
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 92%Socioeconomic
- 74%Household composition
- 73%Racial/ethnic minority
- 83%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 75%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 967Total filings over 16 yrs
- 6.59%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.7%Peak (2007)
- 54Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 74% over the past 16 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 258Total filings 2020-21
- 3.4Avg monthly (observed)
- 3.3Pre-pandemic baseline
- 1.03×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Jade District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Jade District
The score leans hardest on local political climate at 9/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 9/10.
It sits 1.7 points above the Multnomah County average of 7.4. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. The poverty rate is 26%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.
Court records carry 967 eviction filings across 16 observed years. Filings peaked in 2007 at 9.7% of renter households. Average gross rent is $1,515, 8% below the Portland average.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 6.6% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 95th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 9.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 41051008301
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051008301?
Census tract 41051008301 in the Jade District neighborhood scores 9.1/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 41051008301?
Median gross rent is $1,515/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 41051008301?
26.0% of residents in tract 41051008301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,114.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 41051008301?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 74th, minority 73th, housing 83th.
Q5
Is tract 41051008301 considered part of Jade District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051008301 fall within Jade District (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051008301?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 967 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051008301 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.59% of renter households, peaking at 9.7% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 41051008301 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.03× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 41051008301 compare to Portland overall?
Tract 41051008301 scores 9.1/10, higher than the parent city of Portland at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 41051008301 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Portland
Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OR
University District
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Wilkes
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Riverview
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Whitwood Court
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
University District
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Roseway
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
University District
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
University District
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Related