Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #26,446 of 84,120 nationally

Jade District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Portland

Tract 41051001704 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 2,750 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

In Jade District in Portland, census tract 41051001704 scores 6.8/10 for eviction risk. That is riskier than about 91% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 44% of renter households, a severe level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,716 a month against an average household income of $96,458 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 26% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 14% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,229
Renter share25.9%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate5.5%
Median income$96,458

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Jade District
Low
Within parent city
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#112 of 168 tracts In Portland
Low
Within county
34 th percentile
Rank, 34th percentileLowHigh
#130 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
Low
Within state
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#444 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Portland and the region

Centroid at 45.5232, -122.5858 · click any tract to drill in

Why Jade District scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
5.5% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,716 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5

How Jade District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Jade District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.94.9This tracttract 001704Portland: 8.18.1Portlandparent cityCounty: 5.35.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 15

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 75Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.34×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Jade District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Jade District

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Portland eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 2.34x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41051001704

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051001704?

Census tract 41051001704 in the Jade District neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41051001704?

Median gross rent is $1,716/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41051001704?

5.5% of residents in tract 41051001704 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,750.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41051001704?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 14th, minority 29th, housing 31th.
Q5

Is tract 41051001704 considered part of Jade District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051001704 fall within Jade District (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 41051001704 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.34× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 41051001704 compare to Portland overall?

Tract 41051001704 scores 4.9/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 41051001704 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Portland

Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related