Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #13,812 of 84,120 nationally

Jade District Eviction Risk: Elevated , Portland

Tract 41051001704 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 2,750 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Tract 41051001704 sits in the Jade District area of Portland eviction risk, OR, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.8/10. Population here is 2,750. What pushes it up most is local political climate at 9/10.

Risk score
6.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 14% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,229
Renter share25.9%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate5.5%
Median income$96,458

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Jade District
Low
Within parent city
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#120 of 168 tracts In Portland
Low
Within county
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#129 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
Low
Within state
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#326 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Portland and the region

Centroid at 45.5232, -122.5858 · click any tract to drill in

Why Jade District scores 6.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
5.5% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,716 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5

How Jade District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Jade District risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.8This tracttract 0017047.7Portlandparent city7.4Countyavg tract in county6.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 15

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 75Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.34×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Jade District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Jade District

Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 9/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.4/10. Severe burden reaches 15%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

44% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Multnomah County average of 49.7%. Against the Multnomah County average of 7.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.6 points. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Portland. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

On the national scale it lands near the 84th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 2.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Average gross rent is $1,716, close to the Portland average. Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $96,458. 26% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 41051001704

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051001704?

Census tract 41051001704 in the Jade District neighborhood scores 6.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41051001704?

Median gross rent is $1,716/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41051001704?

5.5% of residents in tract 41051001704 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,750.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41051001704?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 14th, minority 29th, housing 31th.
Q5

Is tract 41051001704 considered part of Jade District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051001704 fall within Jade District (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 41051001704 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.34× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 41051001704 compare to Portland overall?

Tract 41051001704 scores 6.8/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 41051001704 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Portland

Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related