Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #13,349 of 84,120 nationally
Jade District Eviction Risk: Elevated , Portland
Tract 41051001601 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 6,131 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
With a score of 6.9/10, tract 41051001601 in the Jade District area of Portland, OR reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Severe burden reaches 39%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
6.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units2,576
Renter share33.2%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate6.7%
Median income$95,638
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
34
th percentile
Low
Within county
38
th percentile
Low
Within state
69
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Portland and the region
Centroid at 45.5136, -122.5906 · click any tract to drill in
Why Jade District scores 6.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
6.7% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$1,217 rent vs county FMR
1.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5
How Jade District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 51
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 43%Socioeconomic
- 19%Household composition
- 40%Racial/ethnic minority
- 83%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 7%Grade B
- 51%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 502Total filings over 16 yrs
- 3.47%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.1%Peak (2005)
- 16Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 61% over the past 16 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 137Total filings 2020-21
- 1.8Avg monthly (observed)
- 1.7Pre-pandemic baseline
- 1.03×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Jade District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Jade District
The score leans hardest on local political climate at 9/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 9/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.1/10.
Average gross rent is $1,217, 26% below the Portland average. 55% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Multnomah County average of 49.7%. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 502 filings here across 16 tracked years.
The worst year on record was 2005, when 5.1% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 3.5% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 84% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 15% of average household income of $95,638, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the OR average is 6.1, so this tract runs 0.8 points hotter.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 41051001601
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051001601?
Census tract 41051001601 in the Jade District neighborhood scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 41051001601?
Median gross rent is $1,217/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 41051001601?
6.7% of residents in tract 41051001601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,131.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 41051001601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 43th, household 19th, minority 40th, housing 83th.
Q5
Is tract 41051001601 considered part of Jade District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051001601 fall within Jade District (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051001601?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 502 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051001601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.47% of renter households, peaking at 5.1% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 41051001601 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.03× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 41051001601 compare to Portland overall?
Tract 41051001601 scores 6.9/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 41051001601 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Portland
Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OR
Arleta
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Chinatown
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Glenfair
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
University District
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Riverview
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Whitwood Court
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Roseway
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
University District
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Related