Neighborhood · Ranked #16,850 of 84,120 nationally
Lents Eviction Risk: Moderate , Portland
Tract 41051008902 ·
Multnomah County, OR · pop 4,412 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Census tract 41051008902 sits in Lents in Portland eviction risk, Oregon eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 6.6/10. That is riskier than roughly 88% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 36% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,449 monthly, set against $78,281 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 62% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22%Stable renters 39%Owners 39%
Tract context
Occupied units1,683
Renter share61.6%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate10.6%
Median income$78,281
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Lents
Moderate
Within parent city
63th percentile
#63 of 168 tracts In Portland
Elevated
Within county
61th percentile
#78 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
Elevated
Within state
75th percentile
#253 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Portland and the region
Centroid at 45.4677, -122.5601 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lents scores 5.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
10.6% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$1,449 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5
How Lents compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 87
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
70%Socioeconomic
79%Household composition
58%Racial/ethnic minority
96%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
0%Grade A
0%Grade B
28%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
1,020Total filings over 16 yrs
9.01%Avg annual filing rate
16.9%Peak (2000)
37Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2000 to 2016
Filings dropped 67% over the past 16 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
386Total filings 2020-21
5.0Avg monthly (observed)
3.1Pre-pandemic baseline
1.61×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lents
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Portland eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 87th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 41051008902
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051008902?
Census tract 41051008902 in the Lents neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 41051008902?
Median gross rent is $1,449/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 41051008902?
10.6% of residents in tract 41051008902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,412.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 41051008902?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 70th, household 79th, minority 58th, housing 96th.
Q5
Is tract 41051008902 considered part of Lents?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051008902 fall within Lents (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051008902?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,020 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051008902 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.01% of renter households, peaking at 16.9% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 41051008902 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.61× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 41051008902 compare to Portland overall?
Tract 41051008902 scores 5.6/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 41051008902 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Portland
Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.