Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,138 of 84,120 nationally

Central City Eviction Risk: Elevated , Gresham

Tract 41051010001 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 5,876 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

How risky is the Central City neighborhood of Gresham for landlords? Census tract 41051010001 scores 6.9/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 93% of US census tracts.

About 65% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 39% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,439 monthly, set against $43,904 in average yearly household income, roughly 39% of income at the averages. Renters make up 75% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 49% Stable renters 26% Owners 25%
Tract context
Occupied units2,622
Renter share75.1%
SVI overall0.92
Poverty rate22.9%
Median income$43,904

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In Central City
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 22 tracts In Gresham
Very High
Within county
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#30 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
High
Within state
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#93 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Gresham and the region

Centroid at 45.5033, -122.4319 · click any tract to drill in

Why Central City scores 6.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Gresham
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
22.9% poverty · this tract
5.7
Supply constraint
$1,439 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Gresham
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Gresham
6.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Gresham
7.5

How Central City compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Central City risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.46.4This tracttract 010001Gresham: 7.47.4Greshamparent cityCounty: 5.35.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 92

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,219Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 5.00%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.9%Peak (2012)
  • 80Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410510100012000: 70 filings (6.67/100 renter HHs)2001: 50 filings (4.76/100 renter HHs)2002: 46 filings (4.38/100 renter HHs)2003: 50 filings (4.76/100 renter HHs)2004: 63 filings (6.00/100 renter HHs)2005: 64 filings (3.90/100 renter HHs)2006: 100 filings (6.09/100 renter HHs)2007: 85 filings (5.18/100 renter HHs)2008: 91 filings (5.54/100 renter HHs)2009: 83 filings (5.05/100 renter HHs)2010: 80 filings (4.31/100 renter HHs)2012: 112 filings (5.90/100 renter HHs)2013: 84 filings (4.43/100 renter HHs)2014: 73 filings (3.85/100 renter HHs)2015: 88 filings (4.64/100 renter HHs)2016: 80 filings (4.57/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 522Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.55×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-02-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-03-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (0.29× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-06-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2022-07-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-08-01: 7 filings (1.75× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (0.78× baseline)2022-10-01: 12 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2022-12-01: 9 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 13 filings (6.50× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.29× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-07-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2023-08-01: 7 filings (1.75× baseline)2023-09-01: 9 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2023-11-01: 8 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-12-01: 14 filings (4.67× baseline)2024-01-01: 15 filings (7.50× baseline)2024-02-01: 12 filings (2.40× baseline)2024-03-01: 13 filings (4.33× baseline)2024-04-01: 9 filings (1.29× baseline)2024-05-01: 14 filings (7.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 16 filings (5.33× baseline)2024-07-01: 17 filings (2.83× baseline)2024-08-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2024-09-01: 18 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 21 filings (7.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 16 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-12-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 14 filings (2.80× baseline)2025-03-01: 9 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 8 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-05-01: 19 filings (9.50× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-07-01: 13 filings (2.17× baseline)2025-08-01: 13 filings (3.25× baseline)2025-09-01: 10 filings (1.11× baseline)2025-10-01: 11 filings (3.67× baseline)2025-11-01: 7 filings (1.17× baseline)2025-12-01: 18 filings (6.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 15 filings (7.50× baseline)2026-02-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2026-03-01: 14 filings (4.67× baseline)2026-04-01: 8 filings (1.14× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Central City. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Central City

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Gresham eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.55x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 92nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41051010001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051010001?

Census tract 41051010001 in the Central City neighborhood scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41051010001?

Median gross rent is $1,439/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41051010001?

22.9% of residents in tract 41051010001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,876.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41051010001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 92th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 86th, household 89th, minority 48th, housing 93th.
Q5

Is tract 41051010001 considered part of Central City?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051010001 fall within Central City (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051010001?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,219 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051010001 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.00% of renter households, peaking at 5.9% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 41051010001 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.55× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 41051010001 compare to Gresham overall?

Tract 41051010001 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Gresham at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Gresham eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Gresham

Top eight tracts in Gresham ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related