Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,660 of 84,120 nationally

Jack Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Tigard

Tract 41067031911 · Washington County, OR · pop 6,422 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

For landlords sizing up the Jack Park area of Tigard, census tract 41067031911 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 5.8/10. It lands near the 67th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

37% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,996 a month while the average household earns $109,808 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 62% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 39% Owners 38%
Tract context
Occupied units2,574
Renter share61.8%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate9.5%
Median income$109,808

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Jack Park
Moderate
Within parent city
55 th percentile
Rank, 55th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 12 tracts In Tigard
Moderate
Within county
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#76 of 134 tracts In Washington County
Moderate
Within state
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#832 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tigard and the region

Centroid at 45.4352, -122.8075 · click any tract to drill in

Why Jack Park scores 3.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tigard
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.7
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
9.5% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,996 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tigard
6.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tigard
7.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tigard
5.6

How Jack Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Jack Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.13.1This tracttract 031911Tigard: 6.96.9Tigardparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 42

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 82Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 1.82%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.0%Peak (2015)
  • 13Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410670319112012: 15 filings (2.11/100 renter HHs)2013: 11 filings (1.55/100 renter HHs)2014: 10 filings (1.41/100 renter HHs)2015: 21 filings (2.95/100 renter HHs)2016: 12 filings (1.38/100 renter HHs)2018: 13 filings (1.49/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 6 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 141Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.57×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 10 filings (2.50× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 7 filings (1.75× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-07-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-02-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-08-01: 7 filings (7.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-10-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Jack Park

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tigard eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Washington County average of 5.9 and in line with the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 42nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 82 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 1.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.0% of renter households in 2015.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 41067031911

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41067031911?

Census tract 41067031911 in the Jack Park neighborhood scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41067031911?

Median gross rent is $1,996/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 37% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41067031911?

9.5% of residents in tract 41067031911 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,422.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41067031911?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 65th, minority 55th, housing 35th.
Q5

Is tract 41067031911 considered part of Jack Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41067031911 fall within Jack Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41067031911?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 82 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 41067031911 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.82% of renter households, peaking at 3.0% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 41067031911 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.57× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 41067031911 compare to Tigard overall?

Tract 41067031911 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Tigard at 6.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tigard eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tigard

Top eight tracts in Tigard ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related