Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Holiday Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Plum

Tract 42003526301 · Allegheny County, PA · pop 3,839 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

With a score of 5.3/10, tract 42003526301 in the Holiday Park area of Plum ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 3,839 residents. On the national scale it ranks #43,291 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

60% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $950 a month while the average household earns $97,188 a year, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 4% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 2% Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units1,526
Renter share4.3%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate4.0%
Median income$97,188

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Holiday Park
Very High
Within parent city
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 6 tracts In Plum
Moderate
Within county
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#357 of 394 tracts In Allegheny County
Very Low
Within state
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#2,992 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Plum and the region

Centroid at 40.4760, -79.7184 · click any tract to drill in

Why Holiday Park scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Plum
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$950 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Plum
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Plum
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Plum
3.0

How Holiday Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Holiday Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 526301Plum: 3.63.6Plumparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 2

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 21Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 5.14%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.7%Peak (2006)
  • 5Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 420035263012000: 2 filings (3.64/100 renter HHs)2001: 2 filings (3.64/100 renter HHs)2002: 3 filings (5.45/100 renter HHs)2003: 4 filings (7.27/100 renter HHs)2004: 2 filings (3.64/100 renter HHs)2005: 3 filings (4.62/100 renter HHs)2006: 5 filings (7.69/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 150% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Holiday Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Holiday Park

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 4.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Plum eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Allegheny County average of 5.6 and in line with the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 21 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 5.1% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.7% of renter households in 2006.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 2nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 42003526301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42003526301?

Census tract 42003526301 in the Holiday Park neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42003526301?

Median gross rent is $950/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 60% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42003526301?

4.0% of residents in tract 42003526301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,839.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42003526301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 11th, minority 4th, housing 7th.
Q5

Is tract 42003526301 considered part of Holiday Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42003526301 fall within Holiday Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42003526301?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 21 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42003526301 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.14% of renter households, peaking at 7.7% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 42003526301 compare to Plum overall?

Tract 42003526301 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Plum at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Plum eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Plum

Top eight tracts in Plum ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related