Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #76,223 of 84,120 nationally

Holiday Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Plum

Tract 42003526302 · Allegheny County, PA · pop 4,989 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

For landlords sizing up the Holiday Park area of Plum, census tract 42003526302 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.4/10. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

16% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,279 a month while the average household earns $98,125 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 32% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 27% Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units2,140
Renter share31.9%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate1.7%
Median income$98,125

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Holiday Park
Very Low
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Plum
Low
Within county
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#363 of 394 tracts In Allegheny County
Very Low
Within state
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#3,065 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Plum and the region

Centroid at 40.4618, -79.7106 · click any tract to drill in

Why Holiday Park scores 1.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Plum
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
1.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,279 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Plum
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Plum
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Plum
3.0

How Holiday Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Holiday Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.81.8This tracttract 526302Plum: 3.63.6Plumparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 6

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 617Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 11.90%Avg annual filing rate
  • 16.8%Peak (2004)
  • 109Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 420035263022000: 78 filings (10.40/100 renter HHs)2001: 57 filings (7.60/100 renter HHs)2002: 64 filings (8.53/100 renter HHs)2003: 73 filings (9.73/100 renter HHs)2004: 126 filings (16.80/100 renter HHs)2005: 110 filings (15.19/100 renter HHs)2006: 109 filings (15.06/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 40% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Holiday Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Holiday Park

What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Plum eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Allegheny County average of 5.6 and below the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 617 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 11.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 16.8% of renter households in 2004.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 6th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 42003526302

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42003526302?

Census tract 42003526302 in the Holiday Park neighborhood scores 1.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42003526302?

Median gross rent is $1,279/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 16% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42003526302?

1.7% of residents in tract 42003526302 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,989.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42003526302?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 15th, minority 16th, housing 27th.
Q5

Is tract 42003526302 considered part of Holiday Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42003526302 fall within Holiday Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42003526302?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 617 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42003526302 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.90% of renter households, peaking at 16.8% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 42003526302 compare to Plum overall?

Tract 42003526302 scores 1.8/10, lower than the parent city of Plum at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Plum eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Plum

Top eight tracts in Plum ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related