Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #24,926 of 84,120 nationally

Cedar Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Philadelphia

Tract 42101008000 · Philadelphia County, PA · pop 3,867 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi

Eviction risk in the Cedar Park neighborhood of Philadelphia centers on tract 42101008000, which scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 3,867 residents. That is riskier than roughly 86% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 40% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 31% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,227 a month against an average household income of $70,526 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 52% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 31% Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units1,817
Renter share51.8%
SVI overall0.54
Poverty rate13.4%
Median income$70,526

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Cedar Park
Very High
Within parent city
32 th percentile
Rank, 32nd percentileLowHigh
#277 of 408 tracts In Philadelphia
Low
Within county
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#266 of 408 tracts In Philadelphia County
Low
Within state
74 th percentile
Rank, 74th percentileLowHigh
#901 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Philadelphia and the region

Centroid at 39.9507, -75.2268 · click any tract to drill in

Why Cedar Park scores 5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Philadelphia
8.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.2
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
13.4% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,227 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Philadelphia
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Philadelphia
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Philadelphia
7.5

How Cedar Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Cedar Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.05.0This tracttract 008000Philadelphia: 5.55.5Philadelphiaparent cityCounty: 5.65.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 54

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 270Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 10.10%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.6%Peak (2010)
  • 63Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 421010080002010: 75 filings (10.58/100 renter HHs)2011: 66 filings (10.09/100 renter HHs)2012: 66 filings (10.09/100 renter HHs)2016: 63 filings (9.63/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 16% over the past 4 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 146Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.45×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 6 filings (1.71× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2020-09-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2022-12-01: 6 filings (1.71× baseline)2023-01-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-06-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.29× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-03-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2024-09-01: 7 filings (1.75× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (0.55× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2025-08-01: 5 filings (1.11× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Palm Beach as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Cedar Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Cedar Park

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at 7.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Philadelphia eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Philadelphia County average of 6.8 and above the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 54th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 42101008000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42101008000?

Census tract 42101008000 in the Cedar Park neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42101008000?

Median gross rent is $1,227/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42101008000?

13.4% of residents in tract 42101008000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,867.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42101008000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 54th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 64th, household 11th, minority 85th, housing 56th.
Q5

Is tract 42101008000 considered part of Cedar Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42101008000 fall within Cedar Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42101008000?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 270 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 42101008000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.10% of renter households, peaking at 10.6% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 42101008000 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.45× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Palm Beach), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 42101008000 compare to Philadelphia overall?

Tract 42101008000 scores 5/10, lower than the parent city of Philadelphia at 5.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Philadelphia eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 42101008000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Philadelphia

Top eight tracts in Philadelphia ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related