Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally

New Heights District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Nashville

Tract 47037016000 · Davidson County, TN · pop 2,629 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

How risky is the New Heights District neighborhood of Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance) for landlords? Census tract 47037016000 scores 5.4/10, the Moderate tier. On the national scale it ranks #40,430 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 56% of renter households, a severe level, and 41% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $825 a month while the average household earns $25,611 a year, roughly 39% of income at the averages. About 77% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 43% Stable renters 34% Owners 23%
Tract context
Occupied units1,232
Renter share76.6%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate44.1%
Median income$25,611

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In New Heights District
Very High
Within parent city
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 166 tracts In Nashville
Very High
Within county
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 174 tracts In Davidson County
Very High
Within state
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#170 of 1,701 tracts In Tennessee
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Nashville and the region

Centroid at 36.1472, -86.7619 · click any tract to drill in

Why New Heights District scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Nashville
6.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
44.1% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$825 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Nashville
1.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Nashville
3.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Nashville
3.1

How New Heights District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
New Heights District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.75.7This tracttract 016000Nashville: 2.52.5Nashvilleparent cityCounty: 3.63.6Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 420Total filings 2020-21
  • 5.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 19.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.28×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 22 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-02-01: 30 filings (1.41× baseline)2020-03-01: 33 filings (1.68× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.06× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-07-01: 3 filings (0.08× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 4 filings (0.15× baseline)2020-10-01: 6 filings (0.31× baseline)2020-11-01: 3 filings (0.15× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.17× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (0.19× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.06× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-07-01: 8 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-08-01: 5 filings (0.37× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (0.12× baseline)2021-10-01: 3 filings (0.15× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.10× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (0.17× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (0.23× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.05× baseline)2022-04-01: 4 filings (0.19× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (0.18× baseline)2022-06-01: 3 filings (0.16× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (0.11× baseline)2022-08-01: 2 filings (0.15× baseline)2022-09-01: 9 filings (0.35× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (0.15× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-01-01: 3 filings (0.10× baseline)2023-02-01: 2 filings (0.09× baseline)2023-03-01: 9 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.05× baseline)2023-05-01: 7 filings (0.42× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.16× baseline)2023-07-01: 4 filings (0.11× baseline)2023-08-01: 11 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (0.15× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.10× baseline)2023-11-01: 3 filings (0.15× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 2 filings (0.07× baseline)2024-02-01: 11 filings (0.52× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (0.14× baseline)2024-05-01: 11 filings (0.66× baseline)2024-06-01: 15 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-07-01: 11 filings (0.30× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (0.37× baseline)2024-09-01: 2 filings (0.08× baseline)2024-10-01: 19 filings (0.97× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.10× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (0.14× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (0.09× baseline)2025-03-01: 45 filings (2.29× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (0.19× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.12× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (0.21× baseline)2025-07-01: 8 filings (0.22× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.12× baseline)2025-10-01: 6 filings (0.31× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2026-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Nashville, TN as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within New Heights District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in New Heights District

What moves this score most is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Nashville eviction risk-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Davidson County average of 4.5 and above the Tennessee statewide average of 4.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.28x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 100% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 47037016000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47037016000?

Census tract 47037016000 in the New Heights District neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 47037016000?

Median gross rent is $825/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 47037016000?

44.1% of residents in tract 47037016000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,629.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 47037016000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 75th, minority 87th, housing 95th.
Q5

Is tract 47037016000 considered part of New Heights District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 47037016000 fall within New Heights District (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 47037016000 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.28× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Nashville eviction risk, TN), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 47037016000 compare to Nashville overall?

Tract 47037016000 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Nashville at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Nashville eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 47037016000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 100% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Nashville

Top eight tracts in Nashville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related