Within parent city
0
th percentile
Very Low
Census Tract · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally
Red Bank Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 47065010600 · Hamilton County, TN · pop 2,993
Census tract 47065010600 covers part of Red Bank, TN, and scores 4.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. Severe burden reaches 37%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 74%
Tract context
Occupied units1,503
Renter share26.1%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate9.7%
Median income$65,991
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
63
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
63
th percentile
Elevated
National
44
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Red Bank and the region
Centroid at 35.1317, -85.2832 · click any tract to drill in
Why Red Bank scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Red Bank
5.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
Tennessee legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
9.7% poverty · this tract
2.4
Supply constraint
$1,139 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Red Bank
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Red Bank
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Red Bank
6.4
How Red Bank compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 26
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 34%Socioeconomic
- 36%Household composition
- 23%Racial/ethnic minority
- 24%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 28%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Red Bank
The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 8.3/10. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.8/10.
Running cool, state political climate reads 1.9/10. Average gross rent is $1,139, 11% below the Red Bank average.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #47,371 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. 42% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the Hamilton County average of 3.9 closely.
Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $65,991. 26% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 47065010600
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 47065010600?
Census tract 47065010600 in Red Bank scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 47065010600?
Median gross rent is $1,139/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 47065010600?
9.7% of residents in tract 47065010600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,993.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 47065010600?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 34th, household 36th, minority 23th, housing 24th.
Q5
How does tract 47065010600 compare to Red Bank overall?
Tract 47065010600 scores 4.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Red Bank at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Red Bank eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q6
Was tract 47065010600 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank
Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related