Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally
Blue Ridge Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 48085030101 · Collin, TX · pop 2,874 · 42% of tract blocks fall in Blue Ridge
With a score of 3.8/10, tract 48085030101 in Blue Ridge, TX reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,874. The clearest offset is state political climate at 1.5/10.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6%
Stable renters 5%
Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units989
Renter share10.6%
SVI overall0.44
Poverty rate9.0%
Median income$105,417
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
66
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
56
th percentile
Elevated
National
38
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Blue Ridge and the region
Centroid at 33.2680, -96.4368 · click any tract to drill in
Why Blue Ridge scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Blue Ridge
5.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.8
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
9.0% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,364 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Blue Ridge
6.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Blue Ridge
5.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Blue Ridge
7.2
How Blue Ridge compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 44
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 47%Socioeconomic
- 61%Household composition
- 52%Racial/ethnic minority
- 26%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Blue Ridge
On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.5/10. Cost burden runs 54% here against 44.7% across Collin County.
Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.1/10. The severe-burden share is 10%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Nationally it ranks #52,479 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $105,417, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Collin County average of 3.6 closely.
Average gross rent is $1,364, close to the Blue Ridge average.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 48085030101
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48085030101?
Census tract 48085030101 in Blue Ridge scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48085030101?
Median gross rent is $1,364/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48085030101?
9.0% of residents in tract 48085030101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,874.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48085030101?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 44th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 47th, household 61th, minority 52th, housing 26th.
Q5
How does tract 48085030101 compare to Blue Ridge overall?
Tract 48085030101 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Blue Ridge at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Blue Ridge; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related