Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Oak Lawn Eviction Risk: Lower , Dallas

Tract 48113000501 · Dallas, TX · pop 1,945 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Census tract 48113000501 covers part of the Oak Lawn area of Dallas, TX, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,945. 18% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, far below the Dallas County average of 47.9%.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 76% Owners 8%
Tract context
Occupied units1,478
Renter share92.5%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate3.2%
Median income$83,842

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#11 of 12 tracts In Oak Lawn
Very Low
Within parent city
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#274 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Low
Within county
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#482 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#4,505 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.8112, -96.8139 · click any tract to drill in

Why Oak Lawn scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,622 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Oak Lawn compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Oak Lawn risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 000501Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 3

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 463Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.7Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.06×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 9 filings (1.29× baseline)2020-02-01: 12 filings (1.44× baseline)2020-03-01: 15 filings (3.75× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (0.88× baseline)2020-09-01: 6 filings (0.90× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (0.47× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2021-08-01: 8 filings (1.41× baseline)2021-09-01: 7 filings (1.05× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-11-01: 15 filings (3.75× baseline)2021-12-01: 4 filings (0.63× baseline)2022-01-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-02-01: 8 filings (0.96× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (0.63× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (0.44× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (0.63× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (0.48× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-05-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-06-01: 7 filings (1.11× baseline)2023-07-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2023-08-01: 7 filings (1.23× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2023-10-01: 9 filings (1.23× baseline)2023-11-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (0.95× baseline)2024-01-01: 10 filings (1.43× baseline)2024-02-01: 6 filings (0.72× baseline)2024-03-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-04-01: 7 filings (1.75× baseline)2024-05-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-06-01: 10 filings (1.58× baseline)2024-07-01: 8 filings (0.89× baseline)2024-08-01: 8 filings (1.41× baseline)2024-09-01: 6 filings (0.90× baseline)2024-10-01: 12 filings (1.64× baseline)2024-11-01: 18 filings (4.50× baseline)2024-12-01: 12 filings (1.90× baseline)2025-01-01: 12 filings (1.71× baseline)2025-02-01: 6 filings (0.72× baseline)2025-03-01: 7 filings (1.75× baseline)2025-04-01: 7 filings (1.75× baseline)2025-05-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (1.11× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-08-01: 13 filings (2.29× baseline)2025-09-01: 12 filings (1.80× baseline)2025-10-01: 11 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 8 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 9 filings (1.42× baseline)2026-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Oak Lawn. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Oak Lawn

92% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. Disability prevalence runs 15.2% against 31.5% nationally. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

It sits 0.8 points below the Dallas County average of 3.8. Average gross rent is $1,622, 10% above the Dallas average.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Dallas. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Social vulnerability reads 1.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the TX average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points cooler.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113000501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113000501?

Census tract 48113000501 in the Oak Lawn neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113000501?

Median gross rent is $1,622/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 18% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113000501?

3.2% of residents in tract 48113000501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,945.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113000501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 0th, minority 74th, housing 42th.
Q5

Is tract 48113000501 considered part of Oak Lawn?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113000501 fall within Oak Lawn (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113000501 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.06× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113000501 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113000501 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 48113000501 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related