Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

Tenth Street Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Dallas

Tract 48113021000 · Dallas, TX · pop 5,853 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

48113021000 is a census tract in the Tenth Street Historic District area of Dallas, TX. It scores 5.1/10 for landlords. It is home to 5,853 residents. The dominant input is economic stress at 10/10.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 15% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,894
Renter share30.9%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate39.9%
Median income$45,344

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Tenth Street Historic District
Very Low
Within parent city
93 th percentile
Rank, 93rd percentileLowHigh
#24 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Very High
Within county
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#92 of 645 tracts In Dallas
High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#565 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.7445, -96.8043 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tenth Street Historic District scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
39.9% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$1,171 rent vs county FMR
1.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Tenth Street Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tenth Street Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 021000Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 463Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.07×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 13 filings (1.86× baseline)2020-02-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2020-03-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 5 filings (0.88× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.16× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-09-01: 5 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-04-01: 8 filings (1.09× baseline)2021-05-01: 5 filings (0.88× baseline)2021-06-01: 6 filings (1.06× baseline)2021-07-01: 3 filings (0.47× baseline)2021-08-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-09-01: 6 filings (0.90× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (1.06× baseline)2021-11-01: 5 filings (1.15× baseline)2021-12-01: 5 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-01-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 8 filings (1.71× baseline)2022-04-01: 5 filings (0.68× baseline)2022-05-01: 7 filings (1.23× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-07-01: 5 filings (0.79× baseline)2022-08-01: 8 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (0.90× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2022-11-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2022-12-01: 9 filings (1.35× baseline)2023-01-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2023-02-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-03-01: 5 filings (1.07× baseline)2023-04-01: 7 filings (0.95× baseline)2023-05-01: 8 filings (1.41× baseline)2023-06-01: 8 filings (1.41× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (0.79× baseline)2023-08-01: 8 filings (1.14× baseline)2023-09-01: 6 filings (0.90× baseline)2023-10-01: 9 filings (1.59× baseline)2023-11-01: 11 filings (2.54× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (0.90× baseline)2024-01-01: 10 filings (1.43× baseline)2024-02-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (1.28× baseline)2024-04-01: 4 filings (0.55× baseline)2024-05-01: 11 filings (1.94× baseline)2024-06-01: 9 filings (1.59× baseline)2024-07-01: 26 filings (4.11× baseline)2024-08-01: 13 filings (1.86× baseline)2024-09-01: 8 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2024-12-01: 5 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-04-01: 6 filings (0.82× baseline)2025-05-01: 10 filings (1.76× baseline)2025-06-01: 4 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (0.95× baseline)2025-08-01: 10 filings (1.43× baseline)2025-09-01: 8 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-10-01: 5 filings (0.88× baseline)2025-11-01: 10 filings (2.31× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2026-01-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Tenth Street Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tenth Street Historic District

The severe-burden share is 32%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Adults with no health insurance runs 34.6% against 11.3% nationally. The poverty rate is 40%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.2/10. Disability prevalence runs 44.0% against 31.5% nationally.

It sits 1.3 points above the Dallas County average of 3.8. Average gross rent is $1,171, 20% below the Dallas average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #31,049 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 9.6/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Statewide the TX average is 3.9, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113021000

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113021000?

Census tract 48113021000 in the Tenth Street Historic District neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113021000?

Median gross rent is $1,171/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 51% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113021000?

39.9% of residents in tract 48113021000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,853.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113021000?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 98th, minority 94th, housing 47th.
Q5

Is tract 48113021000 considered part of Tenth Street Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113021000 fall within Tenth Street Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113021000 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.07× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113021000 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113021000 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 48113021000 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 42% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related