Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #37,857 of 84,120 nationally

Harwood District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Dallas

Tract 48113001901 · Dallas, TX · pop 3,848 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi

Census tract 48113001901 sits in the Harwood District neighborhood of Dallas, Texas. It has a population of 3,848 and an eviction-risk score of 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). 36% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 18% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $2,629/month against a median household income of $120,022 — roughly 26% rent-to-income at the medians.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 52% Owners 18%
Tract context
Occupied units2,589
Renter share82.2%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate16.2%
Median income$120,022

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank — 100th percentileBottomTop
#1 of 3 tracts In Harwood District
Very High
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank — 60th percentileBottomTop
#139 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Elevated
Within county
69 th percentile
Rank — 69th percentileBottomTop
#200 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Elevated
Within state
78 th percentile
Rank — 78th percentileBottomTop
#1,490 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.7941, -96.8075 · click any tract to drill in

Why Harwood District scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
16.2% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
$2,629 rent vs county FMR
9.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Harwood District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Harwood District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 001901Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 5.25.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.94.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D — Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org) — 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 249Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.81×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 — 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-09-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-10-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-11-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-01-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2024-04-01: 7 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2024-06-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2024-07-01: 7 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 5 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-05-01: 7 filings (1.91× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-08-01: 6 filings (2.25× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-12-01: 10 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Harwood District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113001901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113001901?

Census tract 48113001901 in the Harwood District neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113001901?

Median gross rent is $2,629/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.

Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113001901?

16.2% of residents in tract 48113001901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,848.

Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113001901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 9th, household 0th, minority 50th, housing 19th.

Q5

Is tract 48113001901 considered part of Harwood District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113001901 fall within Harwood District (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).

Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113001901 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.81× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.

Q7

How does tract 48113001901 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113001901 scores 5.4/10 — higher than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Q8

Was tract 48113001901 historically redlined?

Yes — this tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 92% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related