Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

Dallas Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 48113011500 · Dallas, TX · pop 4,907

48113011500 is a census tract in Dallas, TX. It scores 5.1/10 for landlords. It is home to 4,907 residents. Cost burden runs 67% here against 47.9% across Dallas County.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 48% Stable renters 24% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units1,513
Renter share72.6%
SVI overall0.99
Poverty rate44.3%
Median income$28,040

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Very High
Within county
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#56 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Very High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#565 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very High
National
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#31,049 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.7348, -96.7268 · click any tract to drill in

Why Dallas scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
44.3% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$927 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Dallas compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Dallas risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 011500Dallas: 3.73.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 99

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 3,030Total filings over 18 yrs
  • 17.26%Avg annual filing rate
  • 46.5%Peak (2005)
  • 82Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 481130115002000: 333 filings (26.25/100 renter HHs)2001: 306 filings (24.13/100 renter HHs)2002: 327 filings (25.78/100 renter HHs)2003: 214 filings (16.87/100 renter HHs)2004: 340 filings (26.81/100 renter HHs)2005: 382 filings (46.47/100 renter HHs)2006: 378 filings (45.98/100 renter HHs)2007: 231 filings (28.10/100 renter HHs)2008: 103 filings (12.53/100 renter HHs)2009: 21 filings (2.55/100 renter HHs)2010: 21 filings (3.69/100 renter HHs)2011: 20 filings (3.26/100 renter HHs)2012: 18 filings (2.94/100 renter HHs)2013: 38 filings (6.20/100 renter HHs)2014: 63 filings (10.28/100 renter HHs)2015: 76 filings (12.40/100 renter HHs)2016: 77 filings (8.00/100 renter HHs)2017: 82 filings (8.52/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 75% over the past 18 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 214Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.48×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2020-02-01: 9 filings (1.93× baseline)2020-03-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (0.28× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2021-09-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.24× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2022-03-01: 6 filings (0.64× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2022-09-01: 6 filings (1.13× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-07-01: 7 filings (1.05× baseline)2023-08-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-11-01: 8 filings (0.96× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-01-01: 5 filings (0.94× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (1.07× baseline)2024-03-01: 4 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 5 filings (0.47× baseline)2024-09-01: 9 filings (1.69× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2025-03-01: 4 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2025-08-01: 3 filings (0.28× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (1.13× baseline)2025-10-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-11-01: 10 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2026-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Dallas

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 10/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 44.5% against 11.3% nationally.

The poverty rate is 44%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. 28% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Average gross rent is $927, 37% below the Dallas average.

Annualized rent equals 40% of average household income of $28,040, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. Disability prevalence runs 49.6% against 31.5% nationally.

On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1/10. 73% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Against the Dallas County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.3 points.

The filing record is not thin: 3,030 evictions over 18 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2005 at 46.5% of renter households.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Dallas. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113011500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113011500?

Census tract 48113011500 in Dallas scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113011500?

Median gross rent is $927/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113011500?

44.3% of residents in tract 48113011500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,907.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113011500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 99th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 97th, minority 96th, housing 85th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48113011500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 3,030 eviction filings across 18 validated years in tract 48113011500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 17.26% of renter households, peaking at 46.5% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113011500 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.48× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113011500 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113011500 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Dallas at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 48113011500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 3% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related