Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,332 of 84,120 nationally

Royal Oaks Country Club Eviction Risk: Moderate , Houston

Tract 48201452202 · Harris, TX · pop 3,557 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

The Moderate-tier score of 5.2/10 for census tract 48201452202 reflects conditions in Royal Oaks Country Club in Houston, Texas. That is riskier than about 44% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 50% of renter households, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,492 a month while the average household earns $63,073 a year, roughly 28% of income at the averages. Renters make up 96% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 48% Stable renters 48% Owners 4%
Tract context
Occupied units1,910
Renter share95.8%
SVI overall0.79
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$63,073

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Royal Oaks Country Club
Very Low
Within parent city
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#511 of 952 tracts In Houston
Moderate
Within county
49 th percentile
Rank, 49th percentileLowHigh
#567 of 1,115 tracts In Harris
Moderate
Within state
62 th percentile
Rank, 62nd percentileLowHigh
#2,641 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Houston and the region

Centroid at 29.7227, -95.5647 · click any tract to drill in

Why Royal Oaks Country Club scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Houston
5.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$1,492 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Houston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Houston
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Houston
2.5

How Royal Oaks Country Club compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Royal Oaks Country Club risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.44.4This tracttract 452202Houston: 2.82.8Houstonparent cityCounty: 4.44.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 79

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 955Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 10.41%Avg annual filing rate
  • 14.1%Peak (2011)
  • 110Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 482014522022009: 84 filings (4.91/100 renter HHs)2010: 149 filings (10.78/100 renter HHs)2011: 178 filings (14.09/100 renter HHs)2012: 165 filings (13.06/100 renter HHs)2013: 150 filings (11.88/100 renter HHs)2014: 119 filings (9.42/100 renter HHs)2015: 110 filings (8.71/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 31% over the past 7 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,644Total filings 2020-21
  • 21.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 10.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 2.01×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 37 filings (2.47× baseline)2020-02-01: 26 filings (2.67× baseline)2020-03-01: 14 filings (1.22× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 3 filings (0.24× baseline)2020-06-01: 37 filings (3.15× baseline)2020-07-01: 11 filings (0.94× baseline)2020-08-01: 23 filings (1.77× baseline)2020-09-01: 15 filings (1.25× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 12 filings (1.07× baseline)2020-12-01: 19 filings (2.92× baseline)2021-01-01: 8 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 12 filings (1.04× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.20× baseline)2021-05-01: 12 filings (0.98× baseline)2021-06-01: 17 filings (1.45× baseline)2021-07-01: 14 filings (1.19× baseline)2021-08-01: 17 filings (1.31× baseline)2021-09-01: 22 filings (1.83× baseline)2021-10-01: 15 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-11-01: 24 filings (2.13× baseline)2021-12-01: 11 filings (1.69× baseline)2022-01-01: 28 filings (1.87× baseline)2022-02-01: 34 filings (3.49× baseline)2022-03-01: 11 filings (0.96× baseline)2022-04-01: 21 filings (2.10× baseline)2022-05-01: 23 filings (1.88× baseline)2022-06-01: 20 filings (1.70× baseline)2022-07-01: 39 filings (3.32× baseline)2022-08-01: 42 filings (3.23× baseline)2022-09-01: 53 filings (4.42× baseline)2022-10-01: 42 filings (3.73× baseline)2022-11-01: 26 filings (2.31× baseline)2022-12-01: 37 filings (5.69× baseline)2023-01-01: 32 filings (2.13× baseline)2023-02-01: 19 filings (1.95× baseline)2023-03-01: 17 filings (1.48× baseline)2023-04-01: 40 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 20 filings (1.63× baseline)2023-06-01: 26 filings (2.21× baseline)2023-07-01: 25 filings (2.13× baseline)2023-08-01: 29 filings (2.23× baseline)2023-09-01: 35 filings (2.92× baseline)2023-10-01: 29 filings (2.58× baseline)2023-11-01: 37 filings (3.29× baseline)2023-12-01: 23 filings (3.54× baseline)2024-01-01: 16 filings (1.07× baseline)2024-02-01: 33 filings (3.38× baseline)2024-03-01: 43 filings (3.74× baseline)2024-04-01: 34 filings (3.40× baseline)2024-05-01: 18 filings (1.47× baseline)2024-06-01: 34 filings (2.89× baseline)2024-07-01: 32 filings (2.72× baseline)2024-08-01: 27 filings (2.08× baseline)2024-09-01: 23 filings (1.92× baseline)2024-10-01: 8 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-11-01: 21 filings (1.87× baseline)2024-12-01: 26 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 16 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-02-01: 27 filings (2.77× baseline)2025-03-01: 16 filings (1.39× baseline)2025-04-01: 15 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-05-01: 19 filings (1.55× baseline)2025-06-01: 22 filings (1.87× baseline)2025-07-01: 15 filings (1.28× baseline)2025-08-01: 13 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 11 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-10-01: 11 filings (0.98× baseline)2025-11-01: 16 filings (1.42× baseline)2025-12-01: 19 filings (2.92× baseline)2026-01-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 32 filings (320.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Houston, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Royal Oaks Country Club. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Royal Oaks Country Club

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 4.8/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Houston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Harris County average of 5.2 and in line with the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is Black and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 79th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 2.01x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, above pre-pandemic levels.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48201452202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48201452202?

Census tract 48201452202 in the Royal Oaks Country Club neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48201452202?

Median gross rent is $1,492/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48201452202?

10.9% of residents in tract 48201452202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,557.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48201452202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 79th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 85th, household 56th, minority 88th, housing 60th.
Q5

Is tract 48201452202 considered part of Royal Oaks Country Club?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48201452202 fall within Royal Oaks Country Club (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48201452202?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 955 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 48201452202 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.41% of renter households, peaking at 14.1% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 48201452202 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 2.01× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Houston eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 48201452202 compare to Houston overall?

Tract 48201452202 scores 4.4/10, higher than the parent city of Houston at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Houston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Houston

Top eight tracts in Houston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related