Census Tract · Ranked #69,776 of 84,120 nationally
Caddo Mills Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 48231961402 ·
Hunt, TX · pop 4,907 · 17% of tract blocks fall in Caddo Mills
How risky is Caddo Mills for landlords? Census tract 48231961402 scores 5.3/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 48% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 50% of renter households, a severe level, and 10% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,425 monthly, set against $97,143 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 13% of occupied homes.
Risk score
2.3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%Stable renters 7%Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,878
Renter share13.3%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate8.1%
Median income$97,143
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Caddo Mills
Moderate
Within county
0th percentile
#21 of 21 tracts In Hunt
Very Low
Within state
17th percentile
#5,697 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Very Low
National
17th percentile
#69,776 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Caddo Mills and the region
Centroid at 33.1160, -96.2594 · click any tract to drill in
Why Caddo Mills scores 2.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Caddo Mills
3.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.4
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
8.1% poverty · this tract
2.0
Supply constraint
$1,425 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Caddo Mills
7.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Caddo Mills
6.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Caddo Mills
5.9
How Caddo Mills compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 35
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 7.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Caddo Mills, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hunt County average of 4.9 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 35th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 48231961402
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48231961402?
Census tract 48231961402 in Caddo Mills scores 2.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48231961402?
Median gross rent is $1,425/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48231961402?
8.1% of residents in tract 48231961402 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,907.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48231961402?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 38th, minority 35th, housing 34th.
Q5
How does tract 48231961402 compare to Caddo Mills overall?
Tract 48231961402 scores 2.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Caddo Mills at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Caddo Mills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.