Census Tract · Ranked #48,956 of 84,120 nationally
Shenandoah Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 48339692103 ·
Montgomery, TX · pop 5,189 · 5% of tract blocks fall in Shenandoah
Census tract 48339692103 covers part of Shenandoah, TX, and scores 4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,189. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 8.6/10.
Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20%Stable renters 29%Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units1,992
Renter share49.7%
SVI overall0.42
Poverty rate7.8%
Median income$93,157
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100th percentile
#1 of 2 tracts In Shenandoah
Very High
Within county
59th percentile
#55 of 133 tracts In Montgomery
Elevated
Within state
61th percentile
#2,721 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Elevated
National
42th percentile
#48,956 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Shenandoah and the region
Centroid at 30.1839, -95.3915 · click any tract to drill in
Why Shenandoah scores 4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Shenandoah
3.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.8
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
7.8% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$1,596 rent vs county FMR
5.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Shenandoah
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Shenandoah
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Shenandoah
6.2
How Shenandoah compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 42
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Severe burden reaches 19%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.6/10.
Average gross rent is $1,596, 13% above the Shenandoah average. That is riskier than roughly 42% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
41% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the Montgomery County average of 3.8 closely.
Annual rent works out to 21% of average household income of $93,157. 50% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 48339692103
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48339692103?
Census tract 48339692103 in Shenandoah scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48339692103?
Median gross rent is $1,596/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48339692103?
7.8% of residents in tract 48339692103 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,189.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48339692103?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 42th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 52th, household 9th, minority 74th, housing 50th.
Q5
How does tract 48339692103 compare to Shenandoah overall?
Tract 48339692103 scores 4/10, right in line with the parent city of Shenandoah at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Shenandoah; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Shenandoah
Top eight tracts in Shenandoah ranked by composite eviction-risk score.