Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,669 of 84,120 nationally
Como Eviction Risk: Moderate , Fort Worth
Tract 48439102500 · Tarrant, TX · pop 3,887 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
With a score of 4.8/10, tract 48439102500 in the Como area of Fort Worth, TX reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,887. The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 29%
Stable renters 28%
Owners 43%
Tract context
Occupied units1,568
Renter share56.9%
SVI overall0.87
Poverty rate26.6%
Median income$45,692
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
96
th percentile
Very High
Within county
81
th percentile
High
Within state
82
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fort Worth and the region
Centroid at 32.7217, -97.4044 · click any tract to drill in
Why Como scores 4.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Fort Worth
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
26.6% poverty · this tract
6.7
Supply constraint
$1,264 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Worth
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Worth
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Worth
2.5
How Como compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 87
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 92%Socioeconomic
- 92%Household composition
- 93%Racial/ethnic minority
- 39%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 2%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 88%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 967Total filings over 17 yrs
- 11.70%Avg annual filing rate
- 15.3%Peak (2011)
- 58Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 41% over the past 17 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 335Total filings 2020-21
- 4.4Avg monthly (observed)
- 5.9Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.74×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Fort Worth, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Como. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Como
The severe-burden share is 24%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.6/10.
Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income of $45,692, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10.
Adults with no health insurance runs 26.3% against 11.3% nationally. The poverty rate is 27%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. It sits 1.0 points above the Tarrant County average of 3.8.
Average gross rent is $1,264, 16% below the Fort Worth average. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 967 filings here across 17 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2011 at 15.3% of renter households.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 11.7% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 58% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the TX average is 3.9, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 48439102500
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48439102500?
Census tract 48439102500 in the Como neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 48439102500?
Median gross rent is $1,264/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 48439102500?
26.6% of residents in tract 48439102500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,887.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 48439102500?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 87th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 92th, minority 93th, housing 39th.
Q5
Is tract 48439102500 considered part of Como?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48439102500 fall within Como (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 48439102500?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 967 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 48439102500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.70% of renter households, peaking at 15.3% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 48439102500 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.74× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Fort Worth eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 48439102500 compare to Fort Worth overall?
Tract 48439102500 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of Fort Worth at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Worth eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 48439102500 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 88% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fort Worth
Top eight tracts in Fort Worth ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · TX
48439106300
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439113948
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
Lindberg
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439104702
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439106502
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439104802
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439123001
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · TX
48439106503
4.8
/ 10 · Moderate
Related