Neighborhood · Ranked #82,639 of 84,120 nationally

Grand Mesa at Crystal Falls Eviction Risk: Lower , Leander

Tract 48453036100 · Travis, TX · pop 5,375 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

For landlords sizing up the Grand Mesa at Crystal Falls neighborhood of Leander, census tract 48453036100 carries a lower eviction-risk score of 3.7/10. That is riskier than roughly 7% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

0% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $216,833 a year. About 2% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score

1.1

Lower

Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 0% Stable renters 2% Owners 98%

Tract context

Occupied units1,916

Renter share2.3%

SVI overall0.02

Poverty rate0.6%

Median income$216,833

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Leander and the region

Centroid at 30.5286, -97.8796 · click any tract to drill in

Why Grand Mesa at Crystal Falls scores 1.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Leander

5.6

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

Texas legislature & governorship

1.5

Economic stress

0.6% poverty · this tract

1.0

Supply constraint

tract rent vs county FMR

5.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Leander

5.1

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

1.4

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Leander

5.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Leander

4.0

How Grand Mesa at Crystal Falls compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 2

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

1%Socioeconomic
9%Household composition
59%Racial/ethnic minority
8%Housing & transportation

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Grand Mesa at Crystal Falls. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Grand Mesa at Crystal Falls

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Leander eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Travis County average of 5.2 and below the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 2nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 48453036100

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48453036100?

Census tract 48453036100 in the Grand Mesa at Crystal Falls neighborhood scores 1.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the poverty rate in tract 48453036100?

0.6% of residents in tract 48453036100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,375.

How socially vulnerable is tract 48453036100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 9th, minority 59th, housing 8th.

Is tract 48453036100 considered part of Grand Mesa at Crystal Falls?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48453036100 fall within Grand Mesa at Crystal Falls (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).

How does tract 48453036100 compare to Leander overall?

Tract 48453036100 scores 1.1/10, lower than the parent city of Leander at 2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Leander eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Leander

Top eight tracts in Leander ranked by composite eviction-risk score.