Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #61,558 of 84,120 nationally

Clinton Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 49011125307 · Davis, UT · pop 7,964 · 67% of tract blocks fall in Clinton

49011125307 is a census tract in Clinton, UT. It scores 3.3/10 for landlords. Severe burden reaches 27%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
3.3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 3% Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units2,297
Renter share3.4%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate7.6%
Median income$112,595

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Clinton
Elevated
Within county
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#33 of 66 tracts In Davis
Moderate
Within state
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#349 of 716 tracts In Utah
Moderate
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,558 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Clinton and the region

Centroid at 41.1369, -112.1031 · click any tract to drill in

Why Clinton scores 3.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Clinton
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
Utah legislature & governorship
1.9
Economic stress
7.6% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Clinton
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Clinton
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Clinton
3.7

How Clinton compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Clinton risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.3This tracttract 1253073.2Clintonparent city3.6Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Clinton

27% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Davis County average of 38.9%. Pulling hardest the other way is eviction-process difficulty at 1.5/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 1.9/10.

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.9/10. SNAP participation runs 6.0% against 15.2% nationally. On the national scale it lands near the 27th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 3% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 1.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

It tracks the Davis County average of 3.6 closely.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 49011125307

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 49011125307?

Census tract 49011125307 in Clinton scores 3.3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 49011125307?

7.6% of residents in tract 49011125307 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,964.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 49011125307?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 6th, household 12th, minority 32th, housing 2th.
Q4

What share of households in tract 49011125307 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q5

How does tract 49011125307 compare to Clinton overall?

Tract 49011125307 scores 3.3/10, right in line with the parent city of Clinton at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Clinton eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Clinton

Top eight tracts in Clinton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related