Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally

Camas Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 53011040609 · Clark County, WA · pop 5,846

Camas anchors census tract 53011040609, which lands at 4.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #56,015 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 41% of renter households, a severe level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,576 monthly, set against $178,444 in average yearly household income, roughly 17% of income at the averages. Renters make up 13% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 8% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,718
Renter share12.6%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate2.7%
Median income$178,444

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Camas
Low
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#104 of 115 tracts In Clark County
Very Low
Within state
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#1,675 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#77,226 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Camas and the region

Centroid at 45.5950, -122.4436 · click any tract to drill in

Why Camas scores 1.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Camas
5.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
2.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,576 rent vs county FMR
7.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camas
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camas
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camas
3.9

How Camas compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Camas risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.71.7This tracttract 040609Camas: 6.76.7Camasparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 4

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 5Total filings over 3 yrs
  • 1.59%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.1%Peak (2013)
  • 3Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530110406092004: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2009: 1 filings (1.97/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (0.70/100 renter HHs)2013: 3 filings (2.10/100 renter HHs)2015: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2017: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2018: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Camas

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 7.9/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Camas eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Clark County average of 5.1 and in line with the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 4th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 5 eviction filings here over 3 tracked years, with about 1.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 2.1% of renter households in 2013.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53011040609

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53011040609?

Census tract 53011040609 in Camas scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53011040609?

Median gross rent is $2,576/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53011040609?

2.7% of residents in tract 53011040609 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,846.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53011040609?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 48th, minority 49th, housing 2th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53011040609?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 5 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 53011040609 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.59% of renter households, peaking at 2.1% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 53011040609 compare to Camas overall?

Tract 53011040609 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Camas at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Camas

Top eight tracts in Camas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related