Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #77,226 of 84,120 nationally

Camas Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 53011040610 · Clark County, WA · pop 3,787

For landlords sizing up Camas, census tract 53011040610 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.6/10. That is riskier than about 24% of US census tracts.

25% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $3,125 a month while the average household earns $176,516 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 6% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1% Stable renters 4% Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units1,221
Renter share5.6%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate1.4%
Median income$176,516

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In Camas
Very Low
Within county
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#105 of 115 tracts In Clark County
Very Low
Within state
6 th percentile
Rank, 6th percentileLowHigh
#1,675 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#77,226 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Camas and the region

Centroid at 45.5997, -122.4138 · click any tract to drill in

Why Camas scores 1.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Camas
5.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
1.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,125 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camas
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camas
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camas
3.9

How Camas compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Camas risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.71.7This tracttract 040610Camas: 6.76.7Camasparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 2

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 7Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 4.31%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.9%Peak (2009)
  • 1Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530110406102004: 1 filings (4.64/100 renter HHs)2009: 4 filings (10.87/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (0.86/100 renter HHs)2013: 1 filings (0.86/100 renter HHs)2015: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2016: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2017: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2018: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 100% over the past 8 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Camas

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Camas eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Clark County average of 5.1 and below the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 7 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 4.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 10.9% of renter households in 2009.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 2nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53011040610

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53011040610?

Census tract 53011040610 in Camas scores 1.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53011040610?

Median gross rent is $3,125/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 25% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53011040610?

1.4% of residents in tract 53011040610 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,787.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53011040610?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 11th, minority 39th, housing 8th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53011040610?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 7 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 53011040610 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.31% of renter households, peaking at 10.9% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 53011040610 compare to Camas overall?

Tract 53011040610 scores 1.7/10, lower than the parent city of Camas at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Camas

Top eight tracts in Camas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related