Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #76,223 of 84,120 nationally

Camas Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 53011040605 · Clark County, WA · pop 6,680 · 42% of tract blocks fall in Camas

Census tract 53011040605 belongs to Camas, Washington. It is home to 6,680 residents and scores 4.3/10, a moderate reading for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 17% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 25% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,892 monthly, set against $126,298 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 25% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 19% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units2,485
Renter share24.9%
SVI overall0.29
Poverty rate2.7%
Median income$126,298

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 6 tracts In Camas
Moderate
Within county
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#102 of 115 tracts In Clark County
Very Low
Within state
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#1,656 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#76,223 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Camas and the region

Centroid at 45.6201, -122.4065 · click any tract to drill in

Why Camas scores 1.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Camas
5.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
2.7% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,892 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camas
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camas
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camas
3.9

How Camas compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Camas risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.81.8This tracttract 040605Camas: 6.76.7Camasparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 29

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 94Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 4.70%Avg annual filing rate
  • 18.7%Peak (2009)
  • 8Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530110406052004: 10 filings (7.80/100 renter HHs)2009: 25 filings (18.65/100 renter HHs)2012: 10 filings (2.06/100 renter HHs)2013: 10 filings (2.06/100 renter HHs)2015: 7 filings (1.44/100 renter HHs)2016: 15 filings (2.61/100 renter HHs)2017: 9 filings (1.57/100 renter HHs)2018: 8 filings (1.39/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 20% over the past 8 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Camas

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Camas eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Clark County average of 5.1 and below the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 29th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 94 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 4.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 18.7% of renter households in 2009.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53011040605

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53011040605?

Census tract 53011040605 in Camas scores 1.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53011040605?

Median gross rent is $1,892/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 25% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53011040605?

2.7% of residents in tract 53011040605 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,680.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53011040605?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 29th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 49th, minority 36th, housing 46th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53011040605?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 94 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 53011040605 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.70% of renter households, peaking at 18.7% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 53011040605 compare to Camas overall?

Tract 53011040605 scores 1.8/10, lower than the parent city of Camas at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Camas

Top eight tracts in Camas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related