Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally

Oak Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Camas

Tract 53011041500 · Clark County, WA · pop 3,155 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

In the Oak Park area of Camas, census tract 53011041500 scores 4.6/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #63,714 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

35% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 19% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,568 a month against an average household income of $87,331 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 51% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 18% Stable renters 33% Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units1,151
Renter share50.7%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate8.2%
Median income$87,331

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Oak Park
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In Camas
Very High
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#77 of 115 tracts In Clark County
Low
Within state
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#1,394 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Camas and the region

Centroid at 45.5834, -122.3897 · click any tract to drill in

Why Oak Park scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Camas
5.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
8.2% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,568 rent vs county FMR
2.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Camas
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Camas
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Camas
3.9

How Oak Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Oak Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 041500Camas: 6.76.7Camasparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 86Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 2.36%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.9%Peak (2012)
  • 6Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 530110415002004: 11 filings (2.58/100 renter HHs)2009: 8 filings (2.02/100 renter HHs)2012: 18 filings (3.88/100 renter HHs)2013: 16 filings (3.45/100 renter HHs)2015: 12 filings (2.59/100 renter HHs)2016: 10 filings (2.06/100 renter HHs)2017: 5 filings (1.03/100 renter HHs)2018: 6 filings (1.23/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 45% over the past 8 months.
Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Oak Park

What moves this score most is eviction process difficulty at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Camas eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Clark County average of 5.1 and below the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 86 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 2.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.9% of renter households in 2012.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 51st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53011041500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53011041500?

Census tract 53011041500 in the Oak Park neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53011041500?

Median gross rent is $1,568/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53011041500?

8.2% of residents in tract 53011041500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,155.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53011041500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 41th, household 65th, minority 24th, housing 63th.
Q5

Is tract 53011041500 considered part of Oak Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53011041500 fall within Oak Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53011041500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 86 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 53011041500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.36% of renter households, peaking at 3.9% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

How does tract 53011041500 compare to Camas overall?

Tract 53011041500 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Camas at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Camas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Camas

Top eight tracts in Camas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related