Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,681 of 84,120 nationally

Ruston Way Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tacoma

Tract 53053060500 · Pierce County, WA · pop 4,103 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Tract 53053060500 sits in the Ruston Way area of Tacoma eviction risk, WA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.6/10. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 10% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,602
Renter share16.4%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate2.1%
Median income$169,773

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Ruston Way
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#50 of 50 tracts In Tacoma
Very Low
Within county
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#101 of 193 tracts In Pierce County
Moderate
Within state
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#986 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tacoma and the region

Centroid at 47.2752, -122.4747 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ruston Way scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tacoma
7.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
2.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,397 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tacoma
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tacoma
7.5

How Ruston Way compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ruston Way risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.6This tracttract 0605007.0Tacomaparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county5.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 3

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 24Total filings over 9 yrs
  • 0.60%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.3%Peak (2015)
  • 6Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 53053060500
Filings climbed 100% over the past 11 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 9Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.60×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked St Louis, MO as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Ruston Way. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ruston Way

Severe burden reaches 24%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.8/10. 38% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the Pierce County average of 47.5%.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 7.8/10. At $1,397 a month, rents run 17% under what the rest of Tacoma commands. The filing record is not thin: 24 evictions over 9 years of observation.

Adults with no health insurance runs 4.0% against 11.3% nationally. Filings peaked in 2015 at 1.3% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 0.6% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 73rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. At 16% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 10% of average household income of $169,773, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 53053060500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53053060500?

Census tract 53053060500 in the Ruston Way neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53053060500?

Median gross rent is $1,397/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53053060500?

2.1% of residents in tract 53053060500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,103.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53053060500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 4th, minority 22th, housing 8th.
Q5

Is tract 53053060500 considered part of Ruston Way?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 53053060500 fall within Ruston Way (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 53053060500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 24 eviction filings across 9 validated years in tract 53053060500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.60% of renter households, peaking at 1.3% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 53053060500 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.60× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (St Louis, MO), 2020-2021.
Q8

How does tract 53053060500 compare to Tacoma overall?

Tract 53053060500 scores 5.6/10, lower than the parent city of Tacoma at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tacoma eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 53053060500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tacoma

Top eight tracts in Tacoma ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related