Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #76,223 of 84,120 nationally

Silver Firs Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 53061052121 · Snohomish County, WA · pop 3,694

How risky is Silver Firs for landlords? Census tract 53061052121 scores 5.3/10, the Moderate tier. It lands near the 48th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 57% of renter households, a severe level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,615 monthly, set against $163,750 in average yearly household income, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 12% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 5% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units1,245
Renter share12.0%
SVI overall0.04
Poverty rate3.5%
Median income$163,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In Silver Firs
Very Low
Within county
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#148 of 173 tracts In Snohomish County
Very Low
Within state
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#1,656 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#76,223 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Silver Firs and the region

Centroid at 47.8814, -122.1464 · click any tract to drill in

Why Silver Firs scores 1.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Silver Firs
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
3.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,615 rent vs county FMR
4.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Silver Firs
8.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Silver Firs
2.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Silver Firs
6.1

How Silver Firs compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Silver Firs risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.81.8This tracttract 052121Silver Firs: 6.66.6Silver Firsparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 4

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Silver Firs

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Silver Firs, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Snohomish County average of 5.2 and in line with the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 4th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 53061052121

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53061052121?

Census tract 53061052121 in Silver Firs scores 1.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53061052121?

Median gross rent is $2,615/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53061052121?

3.5% of residents in tract 53061052121 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,694.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53061052121?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 4th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 3th, minority 33th, housing 21th.
Q5

How does tract 53061052121 compare to Silver Firs overall?

Tract 53061052121 scores 1.8/10, lower than the parent city of Silver Firs at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Silver Firs; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Silver Firs

Top eight tracts in Silver Firs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related