Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #60,063 of 84,120 nationally

Grand Mound Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 53067012710 · Thurston County, WA · pop 2,261 · 15% of tract blocks fall in Grand Mound

Eviction risk in Grand Mound centers on tract 53067012710, which scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier) and is home to 2,261 residents. That is riskier than about 5% of US census tracts.

About 15% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 7% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,198 a month against an average household income of $116,211 a year, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 21% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 18% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units772
Renter share20.9%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$116,211

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Grand Mound
Very Low
Within county
2 th percentile
Rank, 2nd percentileLowHigh
#60 of 61 tracts In Thurston County
Very Low
Within state
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#1,425 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#60,063 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Grand Mound and the region

Centroid at 46.7971, -122.9560 · click any tract to drill in

Why Grand Mound scores 2.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Grand Mound
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,198 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Grand Mound
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Grand Mound
5.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Grand Mound
3.3

How Grand Mound compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Grand Mound risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.92.9This tracttract 012710Grand Mound: 6.76.7Grand Moundparent cityCounty: 4.74.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.54.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 24

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Grand Mound

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 6.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Grand Mound, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Thurston County average of 5.2 and below the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 24th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 53067012710

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53067012710?

Census tract 53067012710 in Grand Mound scores 2.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 53067012710?

Median gross rent is $1,198/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 15% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 53067012710?

3.8% of residents in tract 53067012710 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,261.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 53067012710?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 27th, household 24th, minority 25th, housing 38th.
Q5

How does tract 53067012710 compare to Grand Mound overall?

Tract 53067012710 scores 2.9/10, lower than the parent city of Grand Mound at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Grand Mound; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Grand Mound

Top eight tracts in Grand Mound ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related