Census Tract · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally
Grand Mound Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 53067012710 ·
Thurston County, WA · pop 2,261 · 15% of tract blocks fall in Grand Mound
Census tract 53067012710 covers part of Grand Mound, WA, and scores 3.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 15% here against 47.2% across Thurston County.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3%Stable renters 18%Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units772
Renter share20.9%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$116,211
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Grand Mound
Very Low
Within county
2th percentile
#60 of 61 tracts In Thurston County
Very Low
Within state
6th percentile
#1,663 of 1,772 tracts In Washington
Very Low
National
25th percentile
#63,308 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Grand Mound and the region
Centroid at 46.7971, -122.9560 · click any tract to drill in
Why Grand Mound scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Grand Mound
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,198 rent vs county FMR
1.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Grand Mound
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Grand Mound
5.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Grand Mound
3.3
How Grand Mound compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 24
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
It sits 2.6 points below the Thurston County average of 5.8. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.
Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1.5/10. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 2/10. At $1,198 a month, rents run 16% under what the rest of Grand Mound commands.
That is riskier than roughly 25% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 21% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.2/10. Rent consumes only 12% of average household income of $116,211, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
Statewide the WA average is 5.9, so this tract runs 2.7 points cooler. Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 53067012710
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53067012710?
Census tract 53067012710 in Grand Mound scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53067012710?
Median gross rent is $1,198/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 15% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53067012710?
3.8% of residents in tract 53067012710 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,261.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53067012710?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 27th, household 24th, minority 25th, housing 38th.
Q5
How does tract 53067012710 compare to Grand Mound overall?
Tract 53067012710 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Grand Mound at 4.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Grand Mound; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Grand Mound
Top eight tracts in Grand Mound ranked by composite eviction-risk score.