Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally
Grand Mound Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 53067012720 · Thurston County, WA · pop 7,475 · 45% of tract blocks fall in Grand Mound
Here is how census tract 53067012720, in Grand Mound, looks to a landlord: a 4.3/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 7,475. That is riskier than about 17% of US census tracts.
36% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,267 a month while the average household earns $95,897 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 23% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%
Stable renters 15%
Owners 77%
Tract context
Occupied units2,719
Renter share23.4%
SVI overall0.56
Poverty rate9.0%
Median income$95,897
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
15
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
31
th percentile
Low
National
43
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Grand Mound and the region
Centroid at 46.7921, -123.0854 · click any tract to drill in
Why Grand Mound scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Grand Mound
6.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.9
State political climate
Washington legislature & governorship
6.0
Economic stress
9.0% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,267 rent vs county FMR
1.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Grand Mound
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Grand Mound
5.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Grand Mound
3.3
How Grand Mound compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 56
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 45%Socioeconomic
- 45%Household composition
- 48%Racial/ethnic minority
- 74%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Grand Mound
The score leans hardest on eviction process difficulty at 6.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Grand Mound, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Thurston County average of 5.2 and below the Washington statewide average of 5.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 56th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 53067012720
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 53067012720?
Census tract 53067012720 in Grand Mound scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 53067012720?
Median gross rent is $1,267/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 53067012720?
9.0% of residents in tract 53067012720 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,475.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 53067012720?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 56th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 45th, household 45th, minority 48th, housing 74th.
Q5
How does tract 53067012720 compare to Grand Mound overall?
Tract 53067012720 scores 3.6/10, lower than the parent city of Grand Mound at 6.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Grand Mound; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Grand Mound
Top eight tracts in Grand Mound ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related