Skip to content
Grand Mound, Washington eviction risk overview
City brief · 3,287 residents

Grand Mound, WA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Thurston County · Population 3,287

In 2026
Risk score
6.7
ELEVATED

56th percentile, Washington.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.2 Average3.7 Now6.7
6.7 2.2 1976 · score 2.3 1977 · score 2.3 1978 · score 2.2 1979 · score 2.2 1980 · score 2.3 1981 · score 2.3 1982 · score 2.4 1983 · score 2.4 1984 · score 2.3 1985 · score 2.3 1986 · score 2.3 1987 · score 2.3 1988 · score 2.5 1989 · score 2.5 1990 · score 2.5 1991 · score 2.6 1992 · score 3.0 1993 · score 3.1 1994 · score 3.0 1995 · score 3.1 1996 · score 3.2 1997 · score 3.1 1998 · score 3.2 1999 · score 3.2 2000 · score 3.2 2001 · score 3.3 2002 · score 3.3 2003 · score 3.3 2004 · score 3.4 2005 · score 3.4 2006 · score 3.4 2007 · score 3.4 2008 · score 3.9 2009 · score 4.2 2010 · score 4.4 2011 · score 4.4 2012 · score 4.3 2013 · score 4.2 2014 · score 4.3 2015 · score 4.3 2016 · score 4.3 2017 · score 4.4 2018 · score 4.8 2019 · score 4.9 2020 · score 6.5 2021 · score 6.7 2022 · score 6.6 2023 · score 6.4 2024 · score 6.4 2025 · score 6.7 2026 · score 6.7

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.3 Regional 6.3 State 6.0 Economic 5.1 Supply 6.7 Rent Control 2.0 Eviction 6.2 Tenant 5.8 Housing 3.3 6.7 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +20.4% (2024)
    6.3
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.3
  3. State political climate
    Washington legislature & governorship
    6.0
  4. Economic stress
    8.4% poverty · 3.8% unemp.
    5.1
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,426 average · 26.4% renters
    6.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    20.8% of income on rent
    2.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    144 days filing → judgment
    6.2
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    26.4% renters
    5.8
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Grand Mound and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Grand Mound compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Thurston County
Low
#13 of 16 cities
Rank in county, 20th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 16 cities in Thurston County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Washington
Moderate
#309 of 637 cities
Rank in state, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#309 of 637 cities in Washington for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Grand Mound risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Grand Mound: 6.76.7Grand MoundThis cityCounty: 7.07.0Countyavg in countyState: 7.07.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.7
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.7/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 144d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,426/mo. A contested eviction takes 144 days and costs $8,184–$17,669 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 26.4%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 3,287 residents, 26.4% rent. 21% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 8.4% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.3
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.3 and 6.3 (Dem margin +20.4% (2024)). State climate at 6, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.2, housing court bias 3.3, rent-control risk 2. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.2 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.1. Supply constraint: 6.7. The numbers behind those: 8.4% poverty, 3.8% unemployment, 21% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Grand Mound sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Tacoma, WA · 161d · ~$13.7k all-in ($85/day) · score 7.8 Tacoma Federal Way, WA · 167d · ~$13.5k all-in ($81/day) · score 7.1 Federal Way South Hill, WA · 159d · ~$14.2k all-in ($89/day) · score 6.9 South Hill Lakewood, WA · 158d · ~$12.9k all-in ($82/day) · score 7 Lakewood Lacey, WA · 154d · ~$14.8k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.9 Lacey Olympia, WA · 144d · ~$13.9k all-in ($96/day) · score 7.1 Olympia Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Spokane, WA · 160d · ~$12.5k all-in ($78/day) · score 6.7 Spokane Vancouver, WA · 160d · ~$15.3k all-in ($95/day) · score 7.2 Vancouver Bellevue, WA · 172d · ~$15.2k all-in ($88/day) · score 7.3 Bellevue Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Grand Mound
Grand Mound · 144d · ~$12.9k all-in ($90/day) · score 6.7 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Grand Mound, WA

Landlording in Grand Mound, Washington, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.7/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Grand Mound is a city of 3,287 residents where 26.4% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 20.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,426/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Grand Mound eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.2/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Grand Mound closes 144 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Grand Mound's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Grand Mound runs $8,184 to $17,669 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 144 days of typical timeline and $1,426/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.8/10 in Grand Mound, and the city has limited rent control exposure (2/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Washington, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Grand Mound: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Washington's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $17,669 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Grand Mound

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Cost-versus-timeline trade-off: at 144 days and roughly $17,669 on the high end, cash-for-keys at $7,067 to $10,601 typically beats the legal route for non-aggravated cases. Default judgment frequency is high under HB 1236 + RCW 59.18.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Grand Mound without a reason?

No, Washington state, including Grand Mound, requires "just cause" for termination of tenancy. This means you need a valid, legally recognized reason, such as non-payment of rent, lease violations, or specific circumstances like selling the property for owner occupancy, and you must follow the correct notice periods for each cause. A 20-day notice for a month-to-month lease is for general termination, but even that requires a just cause, and not all reasons are allowed.

Q2

What's the most common mistake landlords make during eviction in Grand Mound?

The most common mistake is failing to serve proper notice or making errors in the notice itself. The 14-day pay-or-quit notice must be perfect. Any mistake in dates, amounts, or delivery method can invalidate the notice and force you to start over, adding weeks or months to the process and increasing your lost rent. Another big mistake is attempting "self-help" eviction by changing locks or shutting off utilities.

Q3

How much can I charge for a late fee in Grand Mound?

Washington state law doesn't explicitly cap late fees, but they must be "reasonable." Generally, 5% of the monthly rent is considered reasonable. Your lease must clearly state the late fee amount and when it applies. Do not try to charge exorbitant late fees as a penalty; courts may reduce them.

Q4

Is it worth offering "cash for keys" in Grand Mound?

Often, yes. Given the typical eviction timeline of 144 days and costs ranging from $8,184, $17,669, offering a tenant a few hundred to a thousand dollars (or more, depending on how much rent they owe and how quickly you want them out) to vacate peacefully and leave the unit clean can save you significant time, legal fees, and lost rent. It's a business decision that often pays off.

Q5

Are there any specific tenant protections in Grand Mound I should know about?

Beyond the statewide just-cause eviction and security deposit rules, Washington state has strong Washington tenant protections including source-of-income discrimination protection. This means you cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because they use a housing voucher or other public assistance to pay rent. You must treat all income sources equally when evaluating an applicant.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.7/10 places Grand Mound in the 56th percentile of Washington cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.