Skip to content
Coker Creek, Tennessee eviction risk overview
City brief · 155 residents

Coker Creek, TN Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Monroe County · Population 155

In 2026
Risk score
2.2
VERY LOW

27th percentile, Tennessee.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.9 Average2.6 Now2.2
10 5 1976 · score 2.7 1977 · score 2.7 1978 · score 2.8 1979 · score 2.8 1980 · score 2.4 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.4 1984 · score 1.9 1985 · score 1.9 1986 · score 1.9 1987 · score 1.9 1988 · score 1.9 1989 · score 1.9 1990 · score 2.0 1991 · score 2.0 1992 · score 2.7 1993 · score 2.7 1994 · score 2.8 1995 · score 2.8 1996 · score 2.7 1997 · score 2.8 1998 · score 2.8 1999 · score 2.8 2000 · score 3.0 2001 · score 3.1 2002 · score 3.2 2003 · score 3.1 2004 · score 2.7 2005 · score 2.8 2006 · score 2.8 2007 · score 2.8 2008 · score 2.8 2009 · score 2.9 2010 · score 2.9 2011 · score 2.9 2012 · score 2.7 2013 · score 2.7 2014 · score 2.7 2015 · score 2.8 2016 · score 2.5 2017 · score 2.6 2018 · score 2.6 2019 · score 2.7 2020 · score 3.0 2021 · score 3.0 2022 · score 2.9 2023 · score 3.0 2024 · score 2.8 2025 · score 2.8 2026 · score 2.2

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.7 Regional 2.7 State 1.9 Economic 5.5 Supply 4.0 Rent Control 1.2 Eviction 1.9 Tenant 4.0 Housing 1.7 2.2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +66.8% (2024)
    2.7
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.7
  3. State political climate
    Tennessee legislature & governorship
    1.9
  4. Economic stress
    75.3% poverty · 4.9% unemp.
    5.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $529 average · 15.6% renters
    4.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    59.6% of income on rent
    1.2
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    37 days filing → judgment
    1.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    15.6% renters
    4.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Coker Creek and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Coker Creek compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Monroe County
Low
#5 of 6 cities
Rank in county, 20th percentileBottomTop
#5 of 6 cities in Monroe County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Tennessee
Low
#377 of 501 cities
Rank in state, 25th percentileBottomTop
#377 of 501 cities in Tennessee for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Coker Creek risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Coker Creek: 2.22.2Coker CreekThis cityCounty: 2.72.7Countyavg in countyState: 3.33.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-0.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 37d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $529/mo. A contested eviction takes 37 days and costs $1,064-$3,233 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 15.6%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 155 residents, 15.6% rent. 60% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 75.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.7
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.7 and 2.7 (GOP margin +66.8% (2024)). State climate at 1.9, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.9
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.9/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.9, housing court bias 1.7, rent-control risk 1.2. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.1 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.5. Supply constraint: 4. The numbers behind those: 75.3% poverty, 4.9% unemployment, 60% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Coker Creek sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government, TN · 37d · ~$2.1k all-in ($57/day) · score 4.5 Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Knoxville, TN · 35d · ~$2.0k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.2 Knoxville Chattanooga, TN · 31d · ~$2.1k all-in ($67/day) · score 2.8 Chattanooga Clarksville, TN · 35d · ~$2.1k all-in ($59/day) · score 2.3 Clarksville Murfreesboro, TN · 35d · ~$2.2k all-in ($63/day) · score 2 Murfreesboro Franklin, TN · 35d · ~$2.1k all-in ($61/day) · score 1.4 Franklin Johnson City, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($63/day) · score 1.5 Johnson City Jackson, TN · 31d · ~$2.2k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.1 Jackson Hendersonville, TN · 36d · ~$2.0k all-in ($54/day) · score 3.4 Hendersonville Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Coker Creek
Coker Creek · 37d · ~$2.1k all-in ($58/day) · score 2.2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Coker Creek, TN

Landlording in Coker Creek, Tennessee, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Coker Creek is a city of 155 residents where 15.6% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 59.6% of income on rent. At an average rent of $529/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Coker Creek eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.9/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Coker Creek closes 37 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Coker Creek's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Coker Creek runs $1,064 to $3,233 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 37 days of typical timeline and $529/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 4/10 in Coker Creek, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.2/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Tennessee, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Coker Creek: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Tennessee's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,233 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Coker Creek

Trap · 2.8/10
The 2.8/10 score combines local political climate, court bias, cost-of-eviction, tenant organizing strength, and the likelihood of new tenant-protective legislation. See the breakdown above for Coker Creek-specific sub-scores.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant claims a maintenance issue as a reason not to pay rent?

In Tennessee, tenants generally cannot withhold rent for maintenance issues without first giving you written notice of the defect and a reasonable time to repair it. If they don't follow this protocol, their claim is likely not a valid defense in court. Always keep records of maintenance requests and repairs.

Q2

Can I change the locks if the tenant is clearly gone but left some belongings?

No. Even if it looks like they've abandoned the property, you must follow the legal eviction process to regain possession. If you change the locks, it could be considered an illegal self-help eviction, and the tenant could sue you. Follow the writ of possession process through the sheriff.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Coker Creek?

While not legally required for General Sessions Court, it's highly recommended, especially if this is your first eviction or if the tenant plans to contest it. An attorney ensures proper procedure is followed, saving you time and money in the long run. Many landlords prefer to handle the initial notice themselves and then engage counsel if court action is needed.

Q4

How long do I have to store a tenant's abandoned property?

Tennessee law allows you to dispose of abandoned property if the tenant does not claim it within 30 days after you send them written notice of the property's location and their intent to dispose of it. Keep good records of this notice and any efforts to contact the tenant. For more details, consult the Tennessee tenant protections guide.

Q5

Is rent control a concern in Coker Creek?

No. Tennessee has a statewide prohibition on rent control. This means cities and counties, including Coker Creek and Monroe County, cannot implement rent control measures. Your ability to set and adjust rents is protected. You can review the Tennessee rent control rules for more information.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.2/10 places Coker Creek in the 27th percentile of Tennessee cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.