Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

Harwood District Eviction Risk: Lower , Dallas

Tract 48113001901 · Dallas, TX · pop 3,848 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi

How risky is Harwood District in Dallas for landlords? Census tract 48113001901 scores 5.4/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 52% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 36% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,629 a month against an average household income of $120,022 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 82% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 52% Owners 18%
Tract context
Occupied units2,589
Renter share82.2%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate16.2%
Median income$120,022

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Harwood District
Very High
Within parent city
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#240 of 348 tracts In Dallas
Low
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#323 of 645 tracts In Dallas
Moderate
Within state
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#3,559 of 6,884 tracts In Texas
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dallas and the region

Centroid at 32.7941, -96.8075 · click any tract to drill in

Why Harwood District scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dallas
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Texas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
16.2% poverty · this tract
4.1
Supply constraint
$2,629 rent vs county FMR
9.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dallas
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dallas
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dallas
3.0

How Harwood District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Harwood District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 001901Dallas: 2.72.7Dallasparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 249Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.81×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 5 filings (1.07× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-09-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-10-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-03-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-11-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-02-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-03-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-09-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-11-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-01-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2024-04-01: 7 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2024-06-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2024-07-01: 7 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-10-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 5 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (0.86× baseline)2025-05-01: 7 filings (1.91× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-08-01: 6 filings (2.25× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-12-01: 10 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Dallas, TX as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Harwood District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Harwood District

What moves this score most is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Dallas eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Dallas County average of 5.2 and above the Texas statewide average of 4.9. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 1st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 92% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 48113001901

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 48113001901?

Census tract 48113001901 in the Harwood District neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 48113001901?

Median gross rent is $2,629/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 48113001901?

16.2% of residents in tract 48113001901 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,848.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 48113001901?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 9th, household 0th, minority 50th, housing 19th.
Q5

Is tract 48113001901 considered part of Harwood District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 48113001901 fall within Harwood District (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 48113001901 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.81× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Dallas eviction risk, TX), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 48113001901 compare to Dallas overall?

Tract 48113001901 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Dallas at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dallas eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 48113001901 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 92% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dallas

Top eight tracts in Dallas ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related